home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.jfk      Discussing the assassination of JFK      99,700 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 99,006 of 99,700   
   Hank Sienzant to David Drummond   
   Re: Huckster Telling Unsupportable Whopp   
   20 Dec 23 10:02:26   
   
   From: hsienzant@aol.com   
      
   On Wednesday, December 20, 2023 at 12:50:34 PM UTC-5, David Drummond wrote:   
   > On Wednesday, December 20, 2023 at 12:46:11 PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:    
   > > On Wednesday, December 20, 2023 at 12:33:33 AM UTC-5, David Drummond   
   wrote:    
   > > > >    
   > > > > I read the 26 volumes and determined there was little to no evidence   
   of a conspiracy.    
   > > > "I read OJ's book; dude seems legit."    
   > > I’m going to call that the logical fallacy of an appeal to ridicule.    
   > >   
   > You should. I am ridiculing you. And drawing parallels while I do it.   
      
   You are ridiculing my arguments, not me. That’s a logical fallacy, and   
   doesn't touch what I said at all.   
      
   And I note that Ben, NoTrueFlags, and now you are staying as far away from   
   discussing the ramifications of Lifton's theory as possible.    
      
   You'd rather employ logical fallacies than actually address a theory many CTs   
   accept.   
      
   Explain that too, while you're explaining how Lifton’s theory makes any   
   sense:   
      
   Instead of resorting to logical fallacies, try dealing with the topic under   
   discussion - whether Lifton’s argument makes any sense, given he admits for   
   his argument to work, it requires all the shooters to be in front of the   
   President (so they could    
   ultimately post-mortem expand the wounds in the front to retrieve the bullets   
   and make those wounds look like exits and put fake wounds on the opposite   
   side). His theory reduces to the need to alter Connally’s wounds as well.   
   And if the President    
   survived, it requires surgery to alter the living President’s wounds (as   
   well as the Governor’s).   
      
   Please explain how this plan had any chance of working, especially since it   
   would make more sense to just attempt to assassinate JFK from behind by one   
   shooter from the TSBD with a good rifle, and then frame Oswald for owning that   
   good weapon?   
      
   What morons planned the assassination in your world?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca