Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.jfk    |    Discussing the assassination of JFK    |    99,700 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 99,006 of 99,700    |
|    Hank Sienzant to David Drummond    |
|    Re: Huckster Telling Unsupportable Whopp    |
|    20 Dec 23 10:02:26    |
      From: hsienzant@aol.com              On Wednesday, December 20, 2023 at 12:50:34 PM UTC-5, David Drummond wrote:       > On Wednesday, December 20, 2023 at 12:46:11 PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:        > > On Wednesday, December 20, 2023 at 12:33:33 AM UTC-5, David Drummond       wrote:        > > > >        > > > > I read the 26 volumes and determined there was little to no evidence       of a conspiracy.        > > > "I read OJ's book; dude seems legit."        > > I’m going to call that the logical fallacy of an appeal to ridicule.        > >       > You should. I am ridiculing you. And drawing parallels while I do it.              You are ridiculing my arguments, not me. That’s a logical fallacy, and       doesn't touch what I said at all.              And I note that Ben, NoTrueFlags, and now you are staying as far away from       discussing the ramifications of Lifton's theory as possible.               You'd rather employ logical fallacies than actually address a theory many CTs       accept.              Explain that too, while you're explaining how Lifton’s theory makes any       sense:              Instead of resorting to logical fallacies, try dealing with the topic under       discussion - whether Lifton’s argument makes any sense, given he admits for       his argument to work, it requires all the shooters to be in front of the       President (so they could        ultimately post-mortem expand the wounds in the front to retrieve the bullets       and make those wounds look like exits and put fake wounds on the opposite       side). His theory reduces to the need to alter Connally’s wounds as well.       And if the President        survived, it requires surgery to alter the living President’s wounds (as       well as the Governor’s).              Please explain how this plan had any chance of working, especially since it       would make more sense to just attempt to assassinate JFK from behind by one       shooter from the TSBD with a good rifle, and then frame Oswald for owning that       good weapon?              What morons planned the assassination in your world?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca