Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.jfk    |    Discussing the assassination of JFK    |    99,700 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 99,011 of 99,700    |
|    Hank Sienzant to David Drummond    |
|    Re: Today is....    |
|    20 Dec 23 10:18:15    |
      From: hsienzant@aol.com              On Wednesday, December 20, 2023 at 12:42:54 AM UTC-5, David Drummond wrote:       > >        > > Funny thing is based on my travels and people I've met, I've found it's       almost IMPOSSIBLE to find five people on earth who are both well-versed in       this case evidence AND believe LHO acted alone.       > This doesn't apply to people in receipt of paychecks for defending the LN       narrative, like Gerald Posner, Bugliosi, Gary Mack, and Henry Sienzant.              Well, that’s the logical fallacy of poisoning the well. Whether I being paid       or not (and I'm not), what I am posting is either true or not. Why can you       discuss the topic and show what I got wrong by citing the evidence? But you       don't go that route, it'       s a constant stream of logical fallacies from you.              I've asked before, as you seem to be knowledgeable about these paychecks,       where do I go to sign up to get paid for what I'm doing now for free?               But you never tell me, why is that?              Alternately, you're just making an assumption you have no evidence for because       it fits your world view. Is this also how you decided upon a conspiracy to       assassinate JFK?              Please advise why you won't discuss Lifton’s theory, which has serious flaws       that render his theory nonsensical.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca