Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.jfk    |    Discussing the assassination of JFK    |    99,700 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 99,014 of 99,700    |
|    Hank Sienzant to David Drummond    |
|    Re: Huckster Telling Unsupportable Whopp    |
|    20 Dec 23 10:43:56    |
      From: hsienzant@aol.com              On Wednesday, December 20, 2023 at 1:10:35 PM UTC-5, David Drummond wrote:       > On Wednesday, December 20, 2023 at 1:02:27 PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:        > > On Wednesday, December 20, 2023 at 12:50:34 PM UTC-5, David Drummond       wrote:        > > > On Wednesday, December 20, 2023 at 12:46:11 PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant       wrote:        > > > > On Wednesday, December 20, 2023 at 12:33:33 AM UTC-5, David Drummond       wrote:        > > > > > >        > > > > > > I read the 26 volumes and determined there was little to no       evidence of a conspiracy.        > > > > > "I read OJ's book; dude seems legit."        > > > > I’m going to call that the logical fallacy of an appeal to ridicule.        > > > >        > > > You should. I am ridiculing you. And drawing parallels while I do it.        > > You are ridiculing my arguments, not me. That’s a logical fallacy, and       doesn't touch what I said at all.        > >        > > And I note that Ben, NoTrueFlags, and now you are staying as far away from       discussing the ramifications of Lifton's theory as possible.        > >        > > You'd rather employ logical fallacies than actually address a theory many       CTs accept.        > >        > > Explain that too, while you're explaining how Lifton’s theory makes any       sense:       > Doesn't need to. Only one shooter needs to be in front of the limousine.              Not according to Lifton, and Lifton’s theory.               If there are shooters behind the President, and a bullet is recovered from a       different weapon, how does that implicate a lone nut and not establish a       conspiracy?               Lifton’s theory solves that problem by putting all the shooters in front of       the President, but it introduced other problems, like the need to alter       Connally’s wounds, or retrieve bullets that wind up deflected deep into       JFK’s body, or if either man        was shot from the front but survived, he never did explain.              And neither will anyone else.              And you pretend these problems go away if we add one shooter in front of the       President.              They don't.               --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca