From: hsienzant@aol.com   
      
   On Wednesday, December 20, 2023 at 1:12:08 PM UTC-5, David Drummond wrote:   
   > On Wednesday, December 20, 2023 at 1:05:09 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:    
   > > On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 09:49:01 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant    
   > >  wrote:    
   > > >On Wednesday, December 20, 2023 at 10:30:50?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:    
   > > >> On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 11:44:50 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant    
   > > >>  wrote:    
   > > >>    
   > > >> >Ben to respond by deleting my points and spamming the group.    
   > > >>    
   > > >> You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the    
   > > >> description of the *location* of the large head wound.    
   > > >>    
   > > >> Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding    
   > > >> paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?    
   > > >>    
   > > >> You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.    
   > > >>    
   > > >> Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?    
   > > >>    
   > > >> Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?    
   > > >>    
   > > >> Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,    
   > > >> and exited the back of his head.    
   > > >>    
   > > >> More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.    
   > > >>    
   > > >> Are you proud of yourself?    
   > > >    
   > > >Called it!    
   > > What you "called" is your own proven cowardice...   
   > I really wish Henry would stop spamming this thread. I'm trying to read the   
   new book I just bought, "If I Did It" by Allen Dulles. Foreword by Arlen   
   Specter.   
      
   More appeal to ridicule. Still a logical fallacy.   
      
   But no CT wants to discuss Lifton’s theory here.   
      
   Curious, ain't it, if it's such a good theory?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)