Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.jfk    |    Discussing the assassination of JFK    |    99,700 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 99,023 of 99,700    |
|    Steven Galbraith to David Drummond    |
|    Re: Today is....    |
|    20 Dec 23 12:34:08    |
      From: stevemgalbraith@yahoo.com              On Wednesday, December 20, 2023 at 2:46:21 PM UTC-5, David Drummond wrote:       > On Wednesday, December 20, 2023 at 2:38:08 PM UTC-5, Steven Galbraith       wrote:        > > On Wednesday, December 20, 2023 at 1:18:17 PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant       wrote:        > > > On Wednesday, December 20, 2023 at 12:42:54 AM UTC-5, David Drummond       wrote:        > > > > >        > > > > > Funny thing is based on my travels and people I've met, I've found       it's almost IMPOSSIBLE to find five people on earth who are both well-versed       in this case evidence AND believe LHO acted alone.        > > > > This doesn't apply to people in receipt of paychecks for defending the       LN narrative, like Gerald Posner, Bugliosi, Gary Mack, and Henry Sienzant.        > > >        > > > Well, that’s the logical fallacy of poisoning the well. Whether I       being paid or not (and I'm not), what I am posting is either true or not. Why       can you discuss the topic and show what I got wrong by citing the evidence?       But you don't go that        route, it's a constant stream of logical fallacies from you.        > > >        > > > I've asked before, as you seem to be knowledgeable about these       paychecks, where do I go to sign up to get paid for what I'm doing now for       free?        > > >        > > > But you never tell me, why is that?        > > >        > > > Alternately, you're just making an assumption you have no evidence for       because it fits your world view. Is this also how you decided upon a       conspiracy to assassinate JFK?        > > >        > > > Please advise why you won't discuss Lifton’s theory, which has serious       flaws that render his theory nonsensical.        > > He thinks this forum, the participation by lone assassin believers, is a       "psyop" operation undertaken by, well I guess the CIA. Then he says you're       being paid. Again I guess by "the CIA". Then to put a conspiracy cherry on his       nut cake he says the        Colorado Supreme Court ruling disqualifying Trump was an act of the "deep       state."        > > But gosh, it's unfair to call him a kook.        > > More important, you forgot to forward your 10% to me this month. It's       Christmas and I need it for some gifts.       > I'm trolling idiots.       Oh, you're just fooling. I guess this mean I won't get my 10%?       Right, I'm the idiot.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca