From: hsienzant@aol.com   
      
   On Wednesday, December 20, 2023 at 3:02:29 PM UTC-5, David Drummond wrote:   
   > >    
   > > Clearly, you see a problem with Lifton’s theory of all the shooters   
   being in front of the President, but you appear reticent to admit that.   
   Instead of all the shooters in front of the President, you want to change his   
   theory to your liking and put    
   one shooter in front of the President (and presumably others elsewhere). But   
   that comes with its own set of issues you and other CTs apparently don't want   
   to discuss either.   
   > This is exactly what Arlen Specter did, but in reverse.   
      
   Another red herring logical fallacy.    
      
   https://www.scribbr.com/fallacies/red-herring-fallacy/#:~:text=A   
   20red%20herring%20fallacy%20refers,on%20purpose%20or%20by%20mistake.   
      
   “A red herring fallacy is an attempt to redirect a conversation away from   
   its original topic. A red herring is used by introducing an irrelevant piece   
   of information that distracts the reader or listener. This can be intentional   
   or unintentional.   
      
   As a result, one can divert others’ attention away from the original   
   discussion topic or avoid answering a difficult question.”   
      
   Why are you avoiding discussing the topic Ben raised in the top post —   
   Lifton’s theory of body alteration?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)