Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.jfk    |    Discussing the assassination of JFK    |    99,700 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 99,045 of 99,700    |
|    Hank Sienzant to David Drummond    |
|    Re: Today is....    |
|    21 Dec 23 12:22:28    |
      From: hsienzant@aol.com              On Wednesday, December 20, 2023 at 7:46:04 PM UTC-5, David Drummond wrote:       > >        > > Where on earth did you find five people who were well-versed in the case       evidence?       > Nowhere, I made them up, because obviously Henry is the only one left on       earth who knows anything about the JFK assassination.              More appeal to ridicule. Still a logical fallacy.                      > >        > > Remember this crime happened 60 years ago. Most of the people alive today       weren't even born when this crime was committed. The vast majority of those       alive now aren't conversant with the evidence and never will be.       > Add "historian" to the list of words not in Henry's vocabulary.              Why? What does the JFK library say about the assassination?               You deleted the exchange that started this. Why?              Let me add it back.              You wrote: “Funny thing is based on my travels and people I've met, I've       found it's almost IMPOSSIBLE to find five people on earth who are both       well-versed in this case evidence AND believe LHO acted alone. Yet there are       like a dozen of them all        converged here. Fucking psyop farm, this place.“              I replied:        “ Remember this crime happened 60 years ago. Most of the people alive today       weren't even born when this crime was committed. The vast majority of those       alive now aren't conversant with the evidence and never will be. There is a       small group of people        with the assassination as an interest. So they congregate online. We see that       everywhere, there are online groups to discuss everything under the sun.              And yet you somehow think that it's suspicious that some other people — with       the same interest but who disagree with your conclusions — find a group that       discusses the assassination and contribute their thoughts?”              What exactly do you find compelling enough to believe we’re all (or mostly)       ‘spooks’?              What exactly is your evidence of that? That we disagree with you?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca