From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Friday, December 22, 2023 at 1:01:53 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:   
   > HARD SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE...    
   >    
   > The "hard evidence" of the 6.5mm virtually round object in the AP    
   > X-ray...    
      
     You refuse to take this anywhere.   
       
   > The "hard evidence" of the medically observed appearance of the bullet    
   > wound in the throat...    
      
     You refuse to show how this is hard evidence.   
       
   > The "hard evidence" of clothing, which was irrationally refused to the    
   > prosectors for examination.    
      
     You refuse to show this is hard evidence.   
       
   > The "hard evidence" of autopsy photos & X-rays that have disappeared.    
      
     You refuse to show they have.   
       
   > The "hard evidence" of photos showing a bullet being recovered in the    
   > grass.    
      
     You refuse to show this bullet.   
       
   > The "hard evidence" of Frazier - and how the Warren Commission went    
   > 'expert shopping' to find Nicol...    
      
     You refuse to show how Frazier is hard evidence.   
      
     You refuse to show the WC went witness shopping.   
       
   > The "hard evidence" of a fingerprint in the 'sniper's nest' that was    
   > never identified.    
      
     You refuse to show this is significant.   
       
   > The "hard evidence" of NAA testing that was concealed by the Warren    
   > Commission. (and lied about to this very day)    
      
     You refuse to produce this testing.   
       
   > The "hard evidence" of rifle testing, where the Warren Commission used    
   > real experts, firing from half the height, at oversized stationary    
   > targets with all the time they wanted for the first shot.    
      
     If you don`t like the testing ignore the results, stupid.   
       
   > The "hard evidence" of the lack of 'First Frame Flash' in the extant    
   > Zapruder film - the very same error that proved the 'alien autopsy'    
   > film a fake.    
      
     You refuse to show this "first frame flash" in other places the film stops   
   and starts.   
       
   > The "hard evidence" of the curb near Tague being patched. Tell us    
   > about the ballistic path of that bullet.    
      
      Shifting the burden.   
       
   > Believers can run, but they can't address the hard evidence in this    
   > case... to say nothing about the eyewitness testimony...   
      
     Seems the usual bunch of meaningless noise.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)