home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.jfk      Discussing the assassination of JFK      99,700 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 99,157 of 99,700   
   Sam McClung to All   
   The JFK Assassination Publishing Industr   
   02 Jan 24 06:52:11   
   
   From: samamcclung@gmail.com   
      
   The facts in this case are very simple. Roscow White fired two shots from a   
   Mauser rifle at JFK, as Roscoe admitted to, one shot entering the neck and   
   exiting the back, and one shot entering the right temple area and exiting the   
   right rear of the head    
   resulting in a massive loss of brain material and bone and a massive gaping   
   exit wound.   
      
   Supporting evidence for this is:   
        - the diary and other things Ricky White found or learned, and possibly   
   one or both of the Mauser rifles Ricky got from Roscoe   
        - Roscoe's image captured in a specific copy of one of Mary Moorman's   
   polaroid pictures within 1 second of the head shot; noting Roscoe is not   
   identifiable in this image but the Mauser sniping rifle he was holding is   
   identifiable enough to match    
   with the following   
        - Roscoe's image captured in a specific frame of a specific copy of the   
   film taken by Abraham Zapruder within +/- 9 seconds of the head shot; noting   
   Roscoe is identifiable in this image and the Mauser sniping rifle he was   
   holding is the same one    
   with the same features seen in the Moorman polaroid copy.   
    - numerous other sources implicating Roscoe.   
      
   The above is why such exorbitant resources have been applied in the massive   
   attempts at covering up the fact Roscoe shot and killed JFK. There has been no   
   debunking of Roscoe's guilt, just sophomoric propaganda by idiots trolling for   
   fame and fortune.    
   One of the easiest tests in identifying coverup material is if it is deemed to   
   debunk Roscoe did it then it is propaganda of the worst degree or sheer idiocy   
   arriving at conclusions by incompetent analysis.   
      
   The healthy approach to this matter is to human up and acknowledge Roscoe   
   could have done it then follow up with complete research and arrive at a   
   conclusion. If that conclusion is anything but Roscoe did it then do further   
   analysis until the truth is    
   arrived at, Roscoe did it. Note most of the relevant info will not be found in   
   published books written by profit seeking authors.   
      
   Regarding the intentional coverup of Roscoe's involvement a lie cannot   
   withstand the test of time.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca