Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.jfk    |    Discussing the assassination of JFK    |    99,700 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 99,157 of 99,700    |
|    Sam McClung to All    |
|    The JFK Assassination Publishing Industr    |
|    02 Jan 24 06:52:11    |
      From: samamcclung@gmail.com              The facts in this case are very simple. Roscow White fired two shots from a       Mauser rifle at JFK, as Roscoe admitted to, one shot entering the neck and       exiting the back, and one shot entering the right temple area and exiting the       right rear of the head        resulting in a massive loss of brain material and bone and a massive gaping       exit wound.              Supporting evidence for this is:        - the diary and other things Ricky White found or learned, and possibly       one or both of the Mauser rifles Ricky got from Roscoe        - Roscoe's image captured in a specific copy of one of Mary Moorman's       polaroid pictures within 1 second of the head shot; noting Roscoe is not       identifiable in this image but the Mauser sniping rifle he was holding is       identifiable enough to match        with the following        - Roscoe's image captured in a specific frame of a specific copy of the       film taken by Abraham Zapruder within +/- 9 seconds of the head shot; noting       Roscoe is identifiable in this image and the Mauser sniping rifle he was       holding is the same one        with the same features seen in the Moorman polaroid copy.        - numerous other sources implicating Roscoe.              The above is why such exorbitant resources have been applied in the massive       attempts at covering up the fact Roscoe shot and killed JFK. There has been no       debunking of Roscoe's guilt, just sophomoric propaganda by idiots trolling for       fame and fortune.        One of the easiest tests in identifying coverup material is if it is deemed to       debunk Roscoe did it then it is propaganda of the worst degree or sheer idiocy       arriving at conclusions by incompetent analysis.              The healthy approach to this matter is to human up and acknowledge Roscoe       could have done it then follow up with complete research and arrive at a       conclusion. If that conclusion is anything but Roscoe did it then do further       analysis until the truth is        arrived at, Roscoe did it. Note most of the relevant info will not be found in       published books written by profit seeking authors.              Regarding the intentional coverup of Roscoe's involvement a lie cannot       withstand the test of time.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca