From: hsienzant@aol.com   
      
   On Wednesday, January 3, 2024 at 10:31:26 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:   
   > On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 05:55:26 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant    
   >  wrote:   
   > >On Friday, December 29, 2023 at 11:25:08?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:    
   > >> My Scenario Part 1    
   > >>    
   > >> First - a quick review is in order. I've demonstrated that I will do    
   > >> precisely what I say I will: to wit, I will match in length, detail,    
   > >> and number of citations any scenario posted by a believer. I've done    
   > >> so repeatedly, and invariably, believers then run away.    
   > >    
   > >You won’t, and you haven’t. We’ve watched your song and dance routine   
   before.   
   > I *can't*. You refuse to provide a scenario.    
      
   My scenario is simple, Oswald killed Kennedy using the C2766 rifle, and I’ve   
   provided evidence from J.C.Day (C2766 rifle discovered in and taken from   
   Depository) and the HSCA photographic panel that Oswald possessed the C2766   
   rifle (validated backyard    
   photos). There is more evidence I haven't gotten to yet, but you need to rebut   
   this evidence already on the table first.   
      
   You said you “will match in length, detail, and number of citations any   
   scenario posted by a believer.”   
      
   I posted that evidence supporting my scenario in April of 2022 — 21 months   
   ago. Still awaiting your citations to the contrary evidence. You never did   
   provide any. You haven't done so here in this thread either.    
       
      
   >    
   > And you're lying about the past - you've not refuted my scenario in    
   > response to Conan's post.    
      
   Shifting the burden. I don't need to refute your scenario, and I never said I   
   would. You need to prove your scenario, not just post and expect others to   
   disprove your claims.   
      
   I’m challenging you to do what you said you could do: “match in length,   
   detail, and number of citations any scenario posted by a believer.”   
      
      
   >    
   > Nor will you.    
   >    
   > You're a coward and a proven liar.    
      
   No, that's not what you said you'd do. You said nothing about calling me names.   
      
   You said you “will match in length, detail, and number of citations any   
   scenario posted by a believer.”   
      
   When do you intend to start?   
      
   Still waiting your citations disproving the conclusions of the HSCA photo   
   panel and the testimony of J.C.Day.   
      
      
   >    
   >    
   > >You apparently think...    
   >    
   >    
   > Logical fallacies won't change the fact that you've run from my post.   
      
   Deleting my points and not doing what you said you could do establishes   
   exactly who laced up their track shoes and started sprinting. It's not me.   
   It's you.   
      
   Do what you said you could do: “…match in length, detail, and number of   
   citations any scenario posted by a believer.”   
      
   Still waiting.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)