From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Friday, January 5, 2024 at 12:19:42 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:   
   > Found in the Education Forum:    
   >    
   > > I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to    
   > > think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.    
      
     I don`t know that they exist.   
       
   > Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific    
   > time?    
      
     Be specific. Name them and quote them.   
       
   > Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the    
   > same time...    
      
     Who has shown they do?   
       
   > In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly    
   > definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses    
   > corroborating each other.    
      
     You have neglected to show that they do. You are doing your usual hot air   
   machine routine.   
       
   > Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.    
   >    
   > I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event    
   > happened at that time.    
      
     Who specified a time for when Tippit was shot?   
      
   >Only a moron would whine that they can't    
   > understand why a time was specified.    
   >    
   >    
   > > But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is    
   > >1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.    
      
     The time people radioed in the shooting is the only established time   
   available.   
       
   > Absent any other information -    
      
     But there is. Oswald being seen there for one.   
      
   >this doesn't even make any sense.    
   >    
   > This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers...   
      
     We look at the information correctly.    
      
   > and    
   > the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that    
   > not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown    
   > here.    
      
     As I`ve told you many times, you have to look at the available information   
   correctly, for what it is and what it isn`t. You refuse to do that because it   
   does harm to the silly games you play with the deaths of these men.   
      
   > They will try to defend it.    
      
    Don`t have to defend looking at things correctly. You don`t have to, it is a   
   free country.   
      
   >(Or simply run away.)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)