From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Sunday, January 7, 2024 at 1:57:18 PM UTC-5, BT George wrote:   
   > On Friday, January 5, 2024 at 8:48:18 PM UTC-6, Bud wrote:    
   > > On Friday, January 5, 2024 at 7:55:18 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:    
   > > > On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 16:51:17 -0800 (PST), Bud     
   > > > wrote:    
   > > >    
   > > > > You are repeating ...    
   > > >    
   > > > Yep. If you didn't get it the first dozen times, I'll keep repeating    
   > > > it:    
   > > Aren`t you afraid that people will see that you have nothing?    
   > > > Found in the Education Forum:    
   > > >    
   > > > > I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to    
   > > > > think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.    
   > > >    
   > > >    
   > > > Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific    
   > > > time?    
   > > >    
   > > > Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the    
   > > > same time...    
   > > >    
   > > > In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly    
   > > > definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses    
   > > > corroborating each other.    
   > > >    
   > > > Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.    
   > > >    
   > > > I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event    
   > > > happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't    
   > > > understand why a time was specified.    
   > > >    
   > > >    
   > > > > But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is    
   > > > >1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.    
   > > >    
   > > >    
   > > > Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.    
   > > >    
   > > > This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and    
   > > > the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that    
   > > > not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown    
   > > > here.    
   > > >    
   > > > They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)    
   > > >    
   > > > Chickenshit has chosen to do both...   
   > Hey Bud. Is there any way I can keep in contact with you if we needed to   
   once this place collapses? I know you don't post under your real name (though   
   I understand it is a moniker you do go by to some in real life.)   
      
     Probably not necessary, the more I think about it the more it seems the   
   timing is right to walk away. The opposition is pretty boring at this point,   
   and the topic is talked out. It was clear to me years and years ago that these   
   guys had nothing, and    
   all they have done is solidify that assessment (when you have nothing you have   
   to try to represent nothing as something). I`m content that I know who killed   
   JFK and how the event played out, what more do I need?   
      
    I`m terrible at correspondence, I have a message from friend who called me   
   who I haven`t talked to in years sitting in my answering machine for months   
   now, still haven`t called him back. Haven`t talked to my brother over the   
   holidays yet (not as bad as    
   it sounds, he is staying at his daughter`s for the holidays and I didn`t want   
   to bother him). Have a friend down in Florida I talk to every few months, but   
   the calls are getting further and further between. I think I have my quota of   
   people to neglect, I    
   don`t need more guilt.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)