From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 1:48:43 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:   
   > On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 10:02:19 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus    
   >  wrote:   
   > >On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 11:43:41?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:    
   > >>    
   > >> The reason no-one would even begin to believe such a wacky theory is that   
   it's intentionally a wacky theory.    
   > >>    
   > >> It's far easier to believe that the problems with chain of custody are   
   real, and caused by intentionally framing a suspect.    
   > >>    
   > >> But Von Penis can't go there. That would be far too credible and would   
   explain evidence he can't explain.    
   > >    
   > >If Oswald were guilty of the crimes he was accused of, all the evidence   
   would add up.    
   > >It doesn't. End of story.   
   > Indeed! I challenge believers to post ANY EVIDENCE AT ALL that they    
   > think supports them... that is undisputed by other evidence.    
       
   > Almost everything in this case is disputed... credibly... by other    
   > evidence... yet believers simply refuse to acknowledge this fact.   
      
     You guys insist on looking at the wrong things incorrectly. Free country, do   
   whatever you like.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)