home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.jfk      Discussing the assassination of JFK      99,700 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 99,275 of 99,700   
   NoTrueFlags Here to Donald Willis   
   Re: Mooney vs Alyea, and the two deposit   
   13 Jan 24 22:30:04   
   
   From: 19efppp@mail.com   
      
   On Saturday, January 13, 2024 at 5:05:21 PM UTC-5, Donald Willis wrote:   
   > Mooney vs Alyea, and the two depository shooting sites    
   >    
   > To hear Deputy Luke Mooney and newsman Tom Alyea talk about the site of the   
   shooting from the depository, you'd think that they were talking about two   
   different locations. And perhaps they were. The Mooney version: "I saw the   
   expended shells on the    
   floor [inside] a cubby hole which had been constructed out of cartons..."   
   (11/23/63 report/Decker Exh 5323p528)    
   >    
   > The Alyea version: "At the time it was suspected that the assassin had   
   stayed quite a time there. There was a s[t]ack with a stack of chicken bones   
   on it. There was a Dr. Pepper bottle..." (12/19/63 statement) [Crime Scene   
   Det. Studebaker verifies the    
   bones: "One of the officers...later emptied the sack, leaving the chicken   
   bones on the floor near the area where they were found... in the third aisle   
   from the [east] side" (FBI interview 5/28/64)] It appears that Alyea at first   
   thought that the sniper    
   shot from the window at which Bonnie Ray Williams--who claimed the chicken and   
   the bottle--had sat eating lunch. In fact, nowhere in Alyea's statement does   
   he mention expended shells or hulls or a "nest" or "cubby hole", only a "gun".   
   As No True Flags    
   Here has found, there is a photo of Alyea at a seventh-floor window, taken   
   about the same time that the shells were found.    
   >    
   > In "Facts and Photos"--Alyea's contribution to Connie Kritzberg's "Secrets   
   from the Sixth Floor Window"--he excludes Mooney from the scene of the finding   
   of the shooting location: "When we arrived on the 6th floor and the location   
   was found, there were    
   no detectives or officers at the location..." (p44) "You can totally disregard   
   any statements made by Mooney. He didn't arrive [at the "nest" location] until   
   much later. He neither saw the casings in their original location nor did he   
   see the barricade    
   until after Studebaker dismantled it, and this was over 30 minutes after the   
   SN was found." (Alyea email to Willis 5/18/98) Mooney sans "nest", Alyea sans   
   shells.    
   >    
   > And to that "no detectives or officers", Det. Studebaker adds, No chicken:    
   > Commission Counsel Joseph Ball: One witness, a deputy sheriff named Luke   
   Mooney said he found a piece of chicken partly eaten up on top of one of the   
   boxes [in the SE corner, over near where you found the cartridges]; did you   
   see anything like that?    
   > Mr. STUDEBAKER. No.    
   > Mr. BALL. Was anything like that called to your attention?    
   > Mr. STUDEBAKER. I can't recall anything like that. It ought to be in one of   
   these pictures, if it is. (vp147)    
   >    
   > So, no detectives, no officers, no chicken. Alyea didn't see Mooney;   
   Studebaker didn't see Mooney's chicken.    
   >    
   > For his part, Mooney excludes Alyea from the finding of the nest". He   
   testifies that he was on his own: "I went straight across to the SE corner...   
   and I saw all those high boxes." (hearings v3p284) But no Alyea.    
   >    
   > Mooney and Alyea seem to have mutually exclusive versions of the discovery   
   of the sniper's location. Certainly, Alyea is most insistent that Mooney was   
   very late getting to the "nest". Whom to believe? Both, I think, in part.   
   There is verification for    
   Mooney's discovery of the empty shells--about the time that Mooney found the   
   shells and, in turn, shouted out the window--as it was "approaching 1 o'clock"   
   (p285)--there is a 12:59 call on the police radio for the Crime Lab to come to   
   the TSBD. (CE    
   1974p41)    
   >    
   > And there is verification that Alyea saw the "nest", though at the time he   
   apparently did not know exactly what it was: In "Pictures of the Pain" (p534),   
   there's a frame blow-up from the film Alyea took that day of the "nest".   
   However, no shells are    
   visible, and there's no picture of Capt. Fritz holding up the shells for Alyea   
   to photograph, as, in later years, he insisted Fritz had done.    
   >    
   > And yet Mooney and Alyea each maintain that the other was not there. Perhaps   
   because there were two "theres" there. Chief Criminal Deputy Allan Sweatt   
   reported that Mooney did indeed holler out the window re "some spent cartridge   
   cases" that had been    
   found. (Decker Exh 5323p532) And, as noted, the 12:59 call on the radio   
   verifies the find, if not the exact location. Apart from the hard evidence of   
   that call and the frame blow-up in Trask, there are only the words of Mooney   
   and Alyea and others to go    
   on that they saw the shells and/or the "nest" early on.    
   >    
   > So all we know for sure, then, is that Mooney found the shells, and that   
   Alyea was at least on the right floor about the time that the "nest" was   
   found. But, as I say, Alyea did not, initially, even mention shells, and   
   seemed to put the place "where [   
   the assassin] fired" outside the "nest", a few windows away from the end   
   window. And as No True Flags Here has found, there's a photo of Alyea at a   
   7th-floor window about the time that the shells were found. Mooney: "At that   
   time [just before he found    
   the shells], some news reporter... was coming up with a camera... So I went   
   back down... to the sixth floor".(p284)    
   >    
   > One way to reconcile the Mooney and Alyea stories, then, is to conclude that   
   there were two separate discoveries (apart from that of the rifle) that   
   afternoon--the shells in one place, the "nest" in another. Mooney in one   
   place, Alyea in another... We    
   know that Mooney found the shells. At the same time, Alyea is adamant that he,   
   Mooney, got to the "nest" late. I believe that, on their respective points   
   here, they're both right. How could that be? As suggested by Alyea's statement   
   above, the shells    
   were not in the "nest" when he was on the floor at the rifle find. Mooney had   
   found them earlier, and perhaps elsewhere. Alyea, then, would have seen the   
   "nest"--but empty--long before Mooney did. However, Mooney seems to have seen   
   the shells long before    
   Alyea did, if the latter saw them at all. In the end, both men said that they   
   saw the shells in the "nest", but each one--at least according to the other's   
   version--must have "placed" them there retroactively.    
   >    
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca