From: gjjmail1202@gmail.com   
      
   On Tuesday, January 16, 2024 at 9:04:51 AM UTC-5, Bud wrote:   
      
   > He looked at what they said correctly, for what it was, and what it wasn`t.    
      
   You don't evaluate witnesses on their merits. What does that even mean ?   
   Certain witnesses were above lying ?   
   You evaluate witnesses based on whether the physical evidence and/or other   
   witnesses corroborate what they say.   
      
   > If everyone could do this there would be no assassination conspiracy   
   theorists.   
      
   There'd be no "believers" like you. There's too much doubt caused by   
   corroborating evidence.   
      
   > Who decides when something is refuted? Let me guess, you appoint yourself   
   that role.   
      
   So you appoint McAdams. McAdams appointed himself. That's why his newsgroup   
   was moderated. It was all about what HE wanted.   
      
   > > [No-one wanted to bet - and if they had, I won.]   
      
   True. Everyone agrees you're a winner.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)