From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Thursday, January 18, 2024 at 11:51:12 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Thursday, January 18, 2024 at 10:55:41 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:    
   > > Title says it all.    
   > >    
   > > We critics keep posting facts that underlie a conspiracy - such as the    
   > > recent posts showing the clothing description of the assassins... and    
   > > believers refuse to address them.    
   > >    
   > > Instead, they post ad hominem attacks.    
   > >    
   > > This tells the tale.   
   > It sure does. The serious researchers post facts and cite their sources   
   while the clowns do no such thing.    
      
     You guys have your own little world going on.   
      
   > You would think that even though they don't have to research anything and   
   can just agree with the Warren Commission, that they'd at least cite the   
   evidence in the Report to support their arguments.    
      
     Hank does that just about every time he posts. You guys either remove it or   
   ignore it.   
      
     But this is a conspiracy forum, you guys are supposed to be explaining how a   
   conspiracy was responsible for this event. Are you ever going to start?   
      
   > But they won't even do that.    
   > I don't know which they're more of: stupidity, ignorance or laziness.    
   > Probably all three.    
      
     You ignore every point made, why do we need to make more?   
      
    You have a reasoning problem, we can`t fix that.   
      
   > At any rate, they come in here every day with the intent of trying to make   
   fools out of other people and end up making fools out of themselves.    
      
     You and Ben will always spin things into a form you are comfortable. That   
   form has no bearing in the real world.   
      
   > Because they're L-O-S-E-R-S. They have been caught in lies time and time   
   again. They have ZERO credibility.    
      
     I have credibility with the right people. Not you delusional types.   
       
   > They claim they come in here for entertainment, but they're the ones who are   
   doing the entertaining.    
      
     You are playing your part right now.   
      
   > It's a laugh and a half to watch them dodge answering questions by using   
   comments, insults and questions.    
   > Their use of terms like "common sense" and "reasoning" are buzz words that   
   reveal they're speculating.    
      
     Just because you can`t tell the difference doesn`t mean other people can`t.   
      
   > And they think those speculations outweigh evidence. Very funny.    
      
     You are so out of touch you don`t realize that all you do is speculate.   
      
     And at what point do you say, "Well, I`ve spent decades accumulating   
   information about the assassination, let me put together something explaining   
   this event as I feel it happened"?   
      
     The answer is never. Whataboutism, "I find this suspicious", empty claims,   
   loaded questions, begged arguments, shifting of the burden, ect is all you   
   will ever have to offer.   
      
   > Having a battle of wits with them is like going to war against an unarmed   
   enemy.    
      
     I thought that was clever when I first heard that decades ago.   
      
   > They're THAT impotent as debaters.    
      
     You run off as soon as your ideas are challenged.    
       
   > Yes, I'll miss the "know nothings" after Feb. 22nd, but I'm sure there will   
   be other idiots, outside of Google, to entertain us on the Usenet.   
      
     You are going nowhere whether we are here or not.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)