Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.jfk    |    Discussing the assassination of JFK    |    99,700 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 99,328 of 99,700    |
|    Hank Sienzant to Gil Jesus    |
|    Re: Critics Post Facts, Believers Post A    |
|    22 Jan 24 13:55:06    |
      From: hsienzant@aol.com              On Thursday, January 18, 2024 at 11:51:12 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:       > On Thursday, January 18, 2024 at 10:55:41 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:        > > Title says it all.        > >        > > We critics keep posting facts that underlie a conspiracy - such as the        > > recent posts showing the clothing description of the assassins... and        > > believers refuse to address them.        > >        > > Instead, they post ad hominem attacks.        > >        > > This tells the tale.       > It sure does. The serious researchers post facts and cite their sources       while the clowns do no such thing.               “Clowns” is ad hominem, not a fact. Ben’s post that starts this thread       is entitled “Critics Post Facts, Believers Post Ad Hominem”. You proved       Ben wrong with the above. Thank you.                     > You would think that even though they don't have to research anything and       can just agree with the Warren Commission, that they'd at least cite the       evidence in the Report to support their arguments.        > But they won't even do that.        > I don't know which they're more of: stupidity, ignorance or laziness.        > Probably all three.               “stupidity, ignorance or laziness” is ad hominem. Ben’s post that starts       this thread is entitled “Critics Post Facts, Believers Post Ad Hominem”.       You proved Ben wrong with the above. No facts, just ad hominem. Thanks again!                     > At any rate, they come in here every day with the intent of trying to make       fools out of other people and end up making fools out of themselves.        > Because they're L-O-S-E-R-S. They have been caught in lies time and time       again. They have ZERO credibility.               “L-O-S-E-R-S” is ad hominem. Still proving Ben wrong. I can't thank you       enough.                     >        > They claim they come in here for entertainment, but they're the ones who are       doing the entertaining.        > It's a laugh and a half to watch them dodge answering questions by using       comments, insults and questions.        > Their use of terms like "common sense" and "reasoning" are buzz words that       reveal they're speculating.        > And they think those speculations outweigh evidence. Very funny.        >        > Having a battle of wits with them is like going to war against an unarmed       enemy.        > They're THAT impotent as debaters.        >        > Yes, I'll miss the "know nothings" after Feb. 22nd, but I'm sure there will       be other idiots, outside of Google, to entertain us on the Usenet.              “Other idiots” is ad hominem. You proved Ben wrong in his claim almost       immediately after his post. Great job, keep up the good work!              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca