home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.jfk      Discussing the assassination of JFK      99,700 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 99,328 of 99,700   
   Hank Sienzant to Gil Jesus   
   Re: Critics Post Facts, Believers Post A   
   22 Jan 24 13:55:06   
   
   From: hsienzant@aol.com   
      
   On Thursday, January 18, 2024 at 11:51:12 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Thursday, January 18, 2024 at 10:55:41 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:    
   > > Title says it all.    
   > >    
   > > We critics keep posting facts that underlie a conspiracy - such as the    
   > > recent posts showing the clothing description of the assassins... and    
   > > believers refuse to address them.    
   > >    
   > > Instead, they post ad hominem attacks.    
   > >    
   > > This tells the tale.   
   > It sure does. The serious researchers post facts and cite their sources   
   while the clowns do no such thing.    
      
   “Clowns” is ad hominem, not a fact. Ben’s post that starts this thread   
   is entitled “Critics Post Facts, Believers Post Ad Hominem”. You proved   
   Ben wrong with the above. Thank you.   
      
      
   > You would think that even though they don't have to research anything and   
   can just agree with the Warren Commission, that they'd at least cite the   
   evidence in the Report to support their arguments.    
   > But they won't even do that.    
   > I don't know which they're more of: stupidity, ignorance or laziness.    
   > Probably all three.    
      
   “stupidity, ignorance or laziness” is ad hominem. Ben’s post that starts   
   this thread is entitled “Critics Post Facts, Believers Post Ad Hominem”.   
   You proved Ben wrong with the above. No facts, just ad hominem. Thanks again!   
      
      
   > At any rate, they come in here every day with the intent of trying to make   
   fools out of other people and end up making fools out of themselves.    
   > Because they're L-O-S-E-R-S. They have been caught in lies time and time   
   again. They have ZERO credibility.    
      
   “L-O-S-E-R-S” is ad hominem. Still proving Ben wrong. I can't thank you   
   enough.   
      
      
   >    
   > They claim they come in here for entertainment, but they're the ones who are   
   doing the entertaining.    
   > It's a laugh and a half to watch them dodge answering questions by using   
   comments, insults and questions.    
   > Their use of terms like "common sense" and "reasoning" are buzz words that   
   reveal they're speculating.    
   > And they think those speculations outweigh evidence. Very funny.    
   >    
   > Having a battle of wits with them is like going to war against an unarmed   
   enemy.    
   > They're THAT impotent as debaters.    
   >    
   > Yes, I'll miss the "know nothings" after Feb. 22nd, but I'm sure there will   
   be other idiots, outside of Google, to entertain us on the Usenet.   
      
   “Other idiots” is ad hominem. You proved Ben wrong in his claim almost   
   immediately after his post. Great job, keep up the good work!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca