From: hsienzant@aol.com   
      
   On Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 7:52:58 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Monday, January 22, 2024 at 5:24:02 PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:   
   > > What was the conclusion of the experts on the Clark panel that studied the   
   photographs and x-rays?   
   > That the photographs and x-rays matched the autopsy report.    
   >    
   > My turn:    
   >    
   > What did the Clark Panel "experts" say about whether or not the photographs   
   and x-rays had been tampered with ?   
      
   The HSCA photographic panel of experts answered that question. The Clark   
   medical panel had no expertise in that area, and their conclusions would have   
   no value, and would not be admissible in court.   
      
   Why do you insist on asking questions about things that aren’t admissible   
   and have no value?   
      
   Speaking of leaving things out, and never telling the whole story, why do you   
   not mention that the x-rays and autopsy photos were validated by the HSCA?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)