Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.jfk    |    Discussing the assassination of JFK    |    99,700 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 99,338 of 99,700    |
|    Gil Jesus to Ben Holmes    |
|    Re: Everything Is Perfect!    |
|    24 Jan 24 03:10:20    |
      From: gjjmail1202@gmail.com              On Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 5:08:58 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:       >        > Such as the OVERWHELMING evidence that witnesses were intimidated into       shutting up about what they heard and saw.        >        > The multiple examples of eyewitnesses swearing under oath that they didn't       say what the FBI reported them saying.        >        > The INCREDIBLE problems with the chain of custody.        >        > The impossible selection of witnesses to call to testify, and the number of       irrelevant questions asked.        >        > The *PROVEN* lies told by the WC & HSCA.        >        > The list can go on and on... (Indeed, Gil Jesus could expand this list       immensely.)        >        > Believers simply shut their eyes to the evidence.        >        > Can't admit the truthfulness of the above, or explain it in no       -conspiratorial terms.        >        > They simply run away.        >        > EVERY        >        > SINGLE        >        > TIME!              And what you've just listed is the "smoking gun" of Oswald's innocence.       In a normal criminal investigation, you don't:              Continue to question a suspect once he has "lawyered up".       Keep a suspect from making a phone call until the next day.       Refuse his family's request to speak with him.       Put him in lineups with police employees dressed differently than the       witnesses' descriptions.       Stage those lineups without a defense attorney present.       Tell witnesses before they view the lineup that the suspect is in the lineup.       Dissuade criminal attorneys from talking to the suspect.       Arraign a suspect on murder charges without defense counsel present or       appointing counsel if he has none.              Fail to establish a chain of custody for the evidence AT THE POINT OF       DISCOVERY by the use of evidence logs.       Fail to photograph evidence as found.       Fail to secure evidence once it is collected.       Fail to secure the Dealey Plaza and Tenth Ave. crime scenes.       Fail to correctly identify evidence that is clearly marked.       Fail to protect the suspect after receiving death threats against him.              Coerce, threaten and harass witnesses into changing their stories or remaining       silent.       Altering witness statements on reports.       Altering statements and forging signatures on sworn affidavits.              And that doesn't even count the inconsistencies in the descriptions of the       wounds or the autopsy debacle.       Or the fact that the shells allegedly found at the Tippit murder scene do not       match the bullets removed from his body.              No, you're right, all of these things would not have occurred in a normal       criminal investigation.       But they would have occurred in a case where the authorities were trying to       frame someone for a crime he did not commit.       And since ALL of these were done in this case, it becomes obvious that the       authorities arrested the wrong man for the crime.       Then covered up that fact.              "Believers", as you call them, have spent the last 60 years making up excuses       for these shortcomings. They think their comments,       speculations and opinions are the equivalent of evidence. They try to fill in       the holes with "common sense" and "reason", neither of which        is recognized as evidence in a court of law. Neither should they be accepted       in the court of public opinion.              They just can't wrap their minds around the fact that they were lied to about       this case.        Corroboration means nothing to these people. It doesn't matter if 30, 40, or       50 witnesses all saw or heard the same thing.       They either lied or were all mistaken.        In their world, the Dallas doctors, who saw on an average 3 gunshot wounds a       day, couldn't tell an entrance wound from an exit wound.              Welcome to the Twilight Zone.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca