From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Wednesday, January 24, 2024 at 4:49:50 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:   
   > On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 13:33:19 -0800 (PST), Bud     
   > wrote:   
   > >On Wednesday, January 24, 2024 at 10:22:18?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:    
   > >> On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 03:39:40 -0800 (PST), Bud     
   > >> wrote:    
   > >>>On Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 5:08:58?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:    
   > >>>> To a believer, everything is perfect. Not a single thing wrong with    
   > >>>> any of the evidence, or with anything the WC, Clark Panel, HSCA, or    
   > >>>> ARRB ever said. (With the sole exception being the audio evidence,    
   > >>>> allegedly refuted.)    
   > >>>>    
   > >>>> Oh, they'll moan about some small item (Huckster actually listed four    
   > >>>> minor items one time - nothing that impugns the official story) - but    
   > >>>> never the important stuff we critics point out. Not *once* has any    
   > >>>> believer publicly acknowledged any problems with this case.    
   > >>>>    
   > >>>> But in order to believe everything is perfect, believers are forced to    
   > >>>> stick their heads in a hole, and simply refuse to address so much of    
   > >>>> the evidence that shows problems in this case.    
   > >>>    
   > >>> Check the archives, you`ll find your issues have been addressed over and   
   over.    
   > >> You're lying. Take, for example, the following... eyewitness    
   > >> intimidation. You cannot cite a *SINGLE* place where this has been    
   > >> addressed by a believer.    
   > >    
   > > So you can ignore it again?   
   > I can't "ignore" what doesn't exist.    
      
     Stipulate that I get to decide when an issue has been addressed and I`ll be   
   happy to get those cites for you.   
       
   > Delusional, aren't you?   
   > >>>> Such as the OVERWHELMING evidence that witnesses were intimidated into    
   > >>>> shutting up about what they heard and saw. Not a *SINGLE* instance of    
   > >>>> intimidation has EVER been admitted by ANY believer. Not once!    
   > >>>>    
   > >>>> The multiple examples of eyewitnesses swearing under oath that they    
   > >>>> didn't say what the FBI reported them saying.    
   > >>>>    
   > >>>> The INCREDIBLE problems with the chain of custody.    
   > >>>>    
   > >>>> The impossible selection of witnesses to call to testify, and the    
   > >>>> number of irrelevant questions asked.    
   > >>>>    
   > >>>> The *PROVEN* lies told by the WC & HSCA.    
   > >>>>    
   > >>>> The list can go on and on... (Indeed, Gil Jesus could expand this list    
   > >>>> immensely.)    
   > >>>>    
   > >>>> Believers simply shut their eyes to the evidence.    
   > >>>>    
   > >>>> Can't admit the truthfulness of the above, or explain it in    
   > >>>> non-conspiratorial terms.    
   > >>>>    
   > >>>> They simply run away.    
   > >>>>    
   > >>>> EVERY    
   > >>>>    
   > >>>> SINGLE    
   > >>>>    
   > >>>> TIME!    
   > >> And Chickenshit proves my point.    
   > >   
   > > I'm delusional.    
   >    
   >    
   > I agree.   
   > >> His absolute cowardice is proven here:    
   > >>    
   > >> So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was    
   > >> "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?    
   > >>    
   > >> Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows    
   > >> that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't    
   > >> get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.    
   > >>    
   > >> It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite    
   > >> where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)    
   > >>    
   > >> So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.   
   > Dead silence...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)