From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Sunday, January 28, 2024 at 1:44:57 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Sunday, January 28, 2024 at 8:42:40 AM UTC-5, Bud wrote:    
   > > The one witness that saw Oswald enter the building was Buell Wesley   
   Frazier. He said Oswald had a long package with him.   
   > First of all, they ignored what Dougherty SAID    
      
     No, stupid, they just didn`t give the information the same weight you do   
   because they looked at it correctly. Nothing he said ruled out Oswald having a   
   package when he saw him, and nothing required Oswald to have a package when   
   Dougherty saw him, as    
   the door Frazier saw Oswald go into was not the door Dougherty saw Oswald come   
   into the room from..   
      
   >about Oswald entering the building and having nothing in his hands.   
      
     Dougherty did not see Oswald enter the building, he saw him enter the room   
   he was in. If you check the layout of the first floor of the TSBD you`ll see   
   that there is a corridor between the two doors (the one Frazier saw him enter   
   and the one Dougherty    
   saw him enter the room through).   
      
   > That NEVER made it to the report.    
      
     You assume some great significance. Perhaps they did not.   
       
   > Secondly, Frazier NEVER testified that he saw Oswald enter the building with   
   a package.    
   > You're ASSUMING that because:    
      
     Because I can think. If Frazier said he saw Oswald wearing a hat, he   
   wouldn`t say "I saw Oswald enter the building, and he was still wearing the   
   hat". He would only mention it if the situation changed, and Oswald was no   
   longer wearing the hat.   
      
   > a. ) he saw Oswald walking toward the building with the package,    
   > b. ) he saw Oswald standing "at the door" ( 2 H 229 ), and    
   > c. ) "glanced up" to see the door closing after Oswald had gone through it (   
   ibid. ).    
      
     Why are cherry picking fragments out of context? He said...   
      
      "Right. The last time I saw him I was right in this area coming across   
   these railroad tracks and I just happened to glance up and see him going   
   through the door there and shut the door."   
      
     He saw him go in the building.    
      
   > Prove me wrong. Cite where Frazier said specifically that:    
      
     You think you are a lawyer and I am on the stand, but you are just an idiot   
   who fancies himself a lawyer.   
      
   > a. ) he saw Oswald enter the building with a package, or    
   > b.) that he saw the package in Oswald's hand as he entered the building.    
      
     If you look at what I actually wrote, you`d see a period between the two   
   thoughts.    
      
     "The one witness that saw Oswald enter the building was Buell Wesley   
   Frazier. He said Oswald had a long package with him."   
      
     Both of those things are true.   
      
     So one, you were wrong to say Douherty saw Oswald come into the building,   
   Frazier saw him go in.   
      
     Two, how does it help your idea if Oswald went into the building without the   
   package? It would only explain Doughtery not seeing it in Oswald`s hands if he   
   ditched it outside.   
      
   > Volume and page, please.    
   >    
   > Thirdly, Frazier ( your eyewitness ) said in this video ( that I'm sure   
   you'll refuse to look at ) that "there was no gun" in the package he saw.    
      
     He never looked inside.   
      
   > https://youtu.be/4olEc4xdVB4   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)