From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Sunday, January 28, 2024 at 4:53:15 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Saturday, January 27, 2024 at 12:25:58 PM UTC-5, Bud wrote:    
   > < his usual useless stupid comments and insults >    
   >    
   > Explain it to ANYBODY'S satisfaction.    
      
     Done.   
      
   > You refuse to even discuss the conflict in the evidence.    
      
     There is no discussion possible with delusional people. You will cling to   
   your delusions no matter what I say.   
      
   > So you go ahead and do what cowards and liars do, you know, what you do   
   best----avoid the issue and keep running.    
   >    
   > Every time you post, you prove to the world what a useless piece of dog shit   
   you really are and how you bring NOTHING to the table.    
      
     I said all that was needed to be said when I wrote this...   
      
     "Folks can hit the link if they are interested in what it looks like when an   
   idiot applies his "reasoning" to information."   
      
   > While you see yourself as "Sir Slick", the world sees you as a coward and a   
   liar who avoids issue after issue.    
   > Your "body of work" over the years is proof of it. You've already   
   established your reputation.    
      
     You`ve established your reputation as a childish thinker who is play games   
   with the deaths of these men.   
       
   > But I guess as long as there are ball suckers like BT George to feed your   
   inflated ego, you'll be around.    
      
     Of course you are going to spin things into some form you are personally   
   comfortable with, it is all you ever do. Why should anyone argue with a   
   delusional person over what he has decided to believe?   
      
   > Because you need the admiration of clueless assholes to validate your   
   useless existence.    
      
     Tell yourself anything you like.   
      
   > IOW, the idiots leading the idiots.    
   >    
   > And when you're finally dead, you and your LN buddies will have NOTHING to   
   show for the hours and hours of your lives you've wasted here.    
      
     Again with your faulty assumptions, that I was looking to have something to   
   show for the time I spent here.   
      
     What did Tom Rossley gain?   
      
   > Lives without any accomplishments or contributions that were wasted on line   
   commenting and insulting people you don't even know.    
      
     Accomplished men already looked into the case. You have nothing to put   
   against their findings, you have no case. You`ll be spinning your wheels until   
   the day you die, never being able to figure out these simple crimes.   
      
   > Hours and hours cowardly running from the conflicts in the evidence.    
      
     "Explain this or that to my satisfaction or I get to believe stupid shit" is   
   just one of your idiotic approaches. Tie all these anomalies into a cohesive   
   package and put them on the table for consideration. You can`t, if you tried   
   it would be like    
   putting up a billboard saying "I`m An Idiot."   
       
   > Conflicts that should not be, if the case against Oswald was authentic.    
      
     You say things you can`t begin to show. Are all resolved cases free from   
   conflict?   
       
   > Now, will you address the link, or will you continue to run from it ?   
      
     I`ve already addressed it.   
      
     "Folks can hit the link if they are interested in what it looks like when an   
   idiot applies his "reasoning" to information."   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)