From: hsienzant@aol.com   
      
   On Wednesday, January 31, 2024 at 11:17:25 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:   
   > On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 19:23:00 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant    
   >  wrote:   
   > >On Tuesday, January 30, 2024 at 5:10:03?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:    
   > >> Don't threaten their "truth" or you will be labelled a "kook" or a   
   "conspiracy nut".    
   > >   
   > > Just a thought — Some on your side of the fence even object to   
   “conspiracy theorist”, without even considering why that phrase is   
   considered perjorative. It’s certainly not a compliment to do what you do on   
   a daily basis — theorize about a    
   conspiracy. What are you accomplishing posting here — to what, ten people at   
   most on a daily basis?   
      
   Half agree with you (somewhat, although no CT truly agrees with any other) and   
   don’t need convincing. The other half you label “the real kooks” and   
   claim they have “JFK’s blood on their hands”.   
      
   Do you really think that’s your best approach to mounting a convincing   
   argument?   
      
      
   >    
   > Stop with the logical fallacies and cowardice... and answer what we    
   > post.    
      
   I did — I responded to one of Gil’s points in Gil’s post.    
      
   You did what you accused me of, deleting and ignoring my point.   
      
   Do you really think that’s your best approach to mounting a convincing   
   argument?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)