From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Friday, February 2, 2024 at 12:13:32 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Friday, February 2, 2024 at 10:28:53 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:    
   > > No moron, you're lying again. The Autopsy Report makes it clear that    
   > > there's a roughly 13cm HOLE in the back of JFK's head... devoid of    
   > > scalp and bone. You can't point to any such thing in the BOH photo.   
   > They're faced with a conundrum.   
      
     Wrong.   
      
   > Either the autopsy report is wrong, or the BOH photo doesn't represent the   
   President's real wounds.    
      
     False Dilemma Fallacy.   
      
   > The only damage to the head in the BOH photo is an open "flap" in the   
   parietal and sphenoid regions, in front of the ear.    
      
     Wrong.   
      
   > There's no defect without scalp in ANY part of the temporal or occipital   
   regions in the BOH photo.    
      
     What did Boswell say he was doing when the BOH photo was taken?   
       
   > https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/WH_Vol16_980-   
   utopsy-report-3.jpg    
   >    
   > And of course, the Dallas doctors said that the BOH photo does NOT represent   
   what they saw that day.    
      
     Quote them saying this.   
      
   > Hanky can cry all he wants, but the evidence is the evidence.    
      
     And idiots play silly games with the evidence.   
      
   > Let him post the evidence that the scalp and bone at the back of the head   
   was intact.   
      
    Shifting the burden.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)