From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Monday, February 5, 2024 at 10:27:37 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:   
   > On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 04:15:01 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus    
   >  wrote:   
   > >On Monday, February 5, 2024 at 5:55:35?AM UTC-5, Bud wrote:    
   > >>    
   > >> 1. Brennan didn`t say Oswald was wearing a different shirt when he saw   
   him in the window and when he saw him in the lineup.    
   > >    
   > >You sure about that ?   
   > No, he's simply lying. He really has no clue.   
   > > Let me post that testimony again:    
   > >    
   > >MR. BRENNAN. That he was not dressed in the same clothes that I saw the man   
   in the window.    
   > >    
   > >MR. BELIN. You mean with reference to the trousers or THE SHIRT ?    
   > >    
   > >MR. BRENNAN. Well, NOT PARTICULARLY EITHER. He just didn't have he same   
   clothes on. ( 3 H 161 )   
   > He wasn't the only witness that described the assassin's clothing as    
   > different from what Oswald was wearing...    
   >    
   > But believers believe... just not the evidence.   
   > >> 2. Oswald may not have been wearing the shirt at the time he shot Kennedy   
   (and there is evidence to that effect).    
   > >    
   > >May not have ? Sounds like you're speculating. Citation ? Source ? Show us   
   that evidence you claim exists.   
   > Don't hold your breath. Chickenshit *can't*.   
   > >> 3. Fibers that got on the rifle from contact made weeks earlier would   
   still be incriminating, the transfer didn`t have to occur on the day of the   
   assassination.    
   > >    
   > >You're speculating again. So when did the fibers get on the shirt ?    
   > >Show us your evidence that the shirt had contact with the rifle before   
   November 22nd.    
   > >    
   > >   
   > The *only* evidence that Oswald ever touched that weapon was    
   > manufactured.   
      
     Do you ever support anything you say?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)