From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Monday, February 5, 2024 at 7:15:03 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Monday, February 5, 2024 at 5:55:35 AM UTC-5, Bud wrote:    
   > >    
   > > 1. Brennan didn`t say Oswald was wearing a different shirt when he saw him   
   in the window and when he saw him in the lineup.   
   > You sure about that ? Let me post that testimony again:   
   > MR. BRENNAN. That he was not dressed in the same clothes that I saw the man   
   in the window.   
   > MR. BELIN. You mean with reference to the trousers or THE SHIRT ?    
   >    
   > MR. BRENNAN. Well, NOT PARTICULARLY EITHER. He just didn't have he same   
   clothes on. ( 3 H 161 )   
      
     Where doe he say Oswald had a different shirt on when he saw him in the   
   window and when he saw him in the lineup?   
      
   > > 2. Oswald may not have been wearing the shirt at the time he shot Kennedy   
   (and there is evidence to that effect).   
   > May not have ?   
      
     Yes, the possibility exists.   
      
   > Sounds like you're speculating.   
      
    It would, you are an idiot who would be baffled by someone putting on or   
   removing a layer of clothing.   
      
    Not a crime you were investigating would ever be solved, you stumped by the   
   simplest things.   
      
   > Citation ? Source ? Show us that evidence you claim exists.   
      
     A waste of time, you have no ability to reason to apply to the evidence.   
      
   > > 3. Fibers that got on the rifle from contact made weeks earlier would   
   still be incriminating, the transfer didn`t have to occur on the day of the   
   assassination.   
   > You're speculating again.    
      
    Offering possibilities that aren`t ruled out isn`t speculating.   
      
   >So when did the fibers get on the shirt ?    
      
    What could that matter? Any time is incriminating because a draws a direct   
   connection between Oswald and the weapon used to kill Kennedy (something else   
   you can`t figure out).   
      
   > Show us your evidence that the shirt had contact with the rifle before   
   November 22nd.    
      
     Doesn`t matter when. Oswald`s shirt being in contact with the murder weapon   
   is incriminating no matter when the contact occurred.   
       
   >    
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)