Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.jfk    |    Discussing the assassination of JFK    |    99,700 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 99,494 of 99,700    |
|    Bud to Gil Jesus    |
|    Re: Evidence of a Frontal Shot -- Part I    |
|    07 Feb 24 02:57:16    |
      From: sirslick@fast.net              On Wednesday, February 7, 2024 at 4:53:09 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:       > On Tuesday, February 6, 2024 at 8:59:05 AM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:        > > There is no evidence of a frontal shot.       > Spoken like a true coward who didn't watch the video because he's afraid of       the truth.        > If you'd watched the video, you'd know why it wasn't in the autopsy report.               If you weren`t an idiot you`d know that it is autopsies that determine the       facts about wounds.              > > Read the original autopsy report.       > I did read the autopsy report. In fact, it's one of the over 4,000 files I       have on the case.        > Did YOU read it ?                Two shots from above and behind.               > Apparently not, because if you did, you'd know that the Back Of Head ( BOH )       autopsy photo does not match the autopsy report.                Internet idiots claim to know more than the pathologists who looked at the       material.              > https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/30098-why-the-governm       nts-case-against-oswald-is-bs-conclusion/?do=findComment&comment=527075        >        > Why is that, Chuck ?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca