From: gjjmail1202@gmail.com   
      
   On Monday, February 12, 2024 at 6:18:40 PM UTC-5, recip...@gmail.com wrote:   
   > On Monday, February 12, 2024 at 3:59:14 PM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:    
   > > On Monday, February 12, 2024 at 3:57:01 PM UTC-5, recip...@gmail.com   
   wrote:    
   > > > The aforementioned Tony Marsh, for starters. Jefferson Morley, to name   
   another. And Gary Buell.    
   > > Are they document experts ?   
   > They all spent years, if not decades, poring through immense piles of   
   FBI/CIA/SS/DoD/WC/HSCA documents. They know what such an item would look like.    
      
   Uh Huh. You mean when Tony Marsh said that McCone would not use Hoover's name   
   but instead would have used his CIA CRYPTO name ?   
   Did Marsh say what that crypto name was ?   
   Or how the head of the Secret Service would be privy to CIA crypto names ?   
      
   That's one of the excuses he used for determning it was fake.   
      
   You're the one who said the document was fake. Prove it.   
      
   You still haven't named the document expert who examined the document and   
   concluded it was a fake.   
   You name researchers who are not experts in forged documents as your "experts".   
   Theirs is only an opinion.   
   You say it's fake. I'll believe you as soon as you tell me who the expert is   
   who concluded that.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)