home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.jfk      Discussing the assassination of JFK      99,700 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 99,536 of 99,700   
   Bud to Ben Holmes   
   Re: Huckster Sienzant Blatantly Lies...   
   12 Feb 24 16:49:29   
   
   From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Monday, February 12, 2024 at 5:26:28 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:   
   > On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 06:38:05 -0800 (PST), Bud     
   > wrote:   
   > >On Monday, February 12, 2024 at 9:28:33?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:    
   > >> On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 16:35:19 -0800 (PST), Bud     
   > >> wrote:    
   > >>>On Friday, February 9, 2024 at 6:33:50?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:    
   > >>>> On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 08:35:08 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant    
   > >>>>  wrote:    
   > >>>>    
   > >>>>    
   > >>>>>> In your email to me, you implied that your mother was a willing    
   > >>>>>> participant... it's still sick!    
   > >>>>>>    
   > >>>>>> You're a sick sick man... get help!    
   > >>>>>    
   > >>>>>We both know I never sent you any emails ever, so perhaps you are   
   projecting once more.    
   > >>>>    
   > >>>> Nope. Just as I've never made the claims you argue against.    
   > >>>    
   > >>> Ben said "the legal system in America".    
   > >>>    
   > >>> Hank said "the U.S. Judicial system".    
   > >>>    
   > >>> Clearly a distinction without a difference, a tempest in a teapot with a   
   dash of arguing to argue.    
   > >> Clearly, you're too stupid to be able to figure out what Huckster    
   > >> claimed I'd said.    
   > >    
   > > I quoted you both.   
   > And *STILL* couldn't figure it out...   
      
     I did. It was a distinction without a difference.    
      
   > Just like you can't figure out what Bugliosi said:    
   >    
   > So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was    
   > "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?    
   >    
   > Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows    
   > that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't    
   > get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.    
   >    
   > It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite    
   > where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)    
   >    
   > So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca