From: chuckschuyler123@gmail.com   
      
   On Thursday, February 15, 2024 at 5:16:36 AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 at 8:20:16 PM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:   
      
   > > Years go, why didn't you guys just set up an email group and Cc each other   
   about various conspiracy topics if you're not interested in reading what your   
   critics write?   
      
   > Because the world has access to Usenet newsgroups. It doesn't have access to   
   our private conversations.    
      
   Name a "critic" of yours that you are interested in reading or hearing from.   
      
   > We're trying to get our message out to the world, not to each other.    
      
   What message, Gil? You all have a DIFFERENT point of view. Different captains   
   on different ships carrying different cargo in different directions to   
   different ports, yet you all pretend to be part of the same convoy: Team   
   Oswald. This doesn't mean you    
   shouldn't be able to post whatever you want, but you seem clueless to the idea   
   that few of you can agree on anything other than the vague notion that on   
   11/22/63, something happened, somehow.   
      
   Man, you are delusional. Countless websites, blogs, books, articles, YouTube   
   documentaries, movies, television shows, etc. have tackled this subject from   
   all sides, not to mention several MAJOR investigations, and yet you feel YOUR   
   MESSAGE--that some    
   people did something on 11/22/63--needs to get out there?   
      
   > Why on earth would we go private when we have the usenet ?    
   > That's a pretty stupid question.   
   > > NO ONE except you two and maybe Gentleman Don are going to participate   
   here after 2/22/24.   
      
   > Not true. Anyone in the world who has access to Usenet newsgroups using a   
   newsreader and NNTP server other than Google will be able to participate.    
      
   You'll block anyone who presses you for an explanation for what happened on   
   11/22/63.   
      
   > You're assuming that no one in the world pays for Usenet newsgroup access.   
   That's not true.    
      
      
   I don't assume that at all. I have read that Usenet has really faded in   
   popularity. It's an outdated platform (which I enjoyed) but the world has   
   moved on. I'm taking the hint. You? Not so much. You'll do some odd   
   Snoopy-Dance on 02/22/24 about "winning"    
   some contest and declare "victory" over the so-called "believers," as Ben   
   says. Weird.   
      
   > Plus, our posts to a.c.j. will appear in search engines, while posts in   
   Google Groups do not.   
   > > In fact, you could set up the email chain NOW or use Messenger on Facebook   
   or something and not need to deal with any of your critics.   
   > We will be able to see the posts of our opponents who have not been blocked.    
      
   Like?   
      
   > Insulting jackasses like yourself who have nothing of value to contribute   
   and have no credibility will be blocked. ( from my screen, I can't speak for   
   Ben )    
      
   "Of value to contribute" means agreeing with you that you--as Oswald's Johnny   
   Cochrane--would've managed to get evidence against your hero Oswald thrown out   
   at a criminal trial which (was never going to happen after Ruby's well-placed   
   shot) thus freeing    
   him to walk arm-and-arm with you out of court, flash bulbs popping. You are   
   utterly delusional.   
   >    
   > My posts are seen on several different formats, including X ( formerly   
   Twitter ) , Facebook, several JFK forums and I've appeared more than a half   
   dozen times on internet podcasts.    
   > My essays and videos have received world-wide exposure. My writings have   
   been sources for several different authors.    
   > A search for "gil jesus jfk" on any search engine will reveal my   
   contributions to the JFK assassination community.    
      
   You've contributed nothing, you whiny, sniveling child. I forwarded your   
   website to JFK's online library and they never contracted you. I'll bet you   
   were roundly laughed at, if anyone even bothered to read your drivel. You're   
   the online version of the    
   old-fashioned cranks who used to stand on corners with a bullhorn, screeching   
   about the world coming to an end for one reason or another, passing out   
   flyers--like your hero Oswald in New Orleans--only to eventually get shooed   
   away by some beat cop.    
   >    
   > What have you Lone Nutters accomplished in your many years here ?    
      
   My accomplishments are blessedly away from here. What have you accomplished?   
   Belief in a JFK conspiracy was at it's zenith a long time ago. Team Oswald has   
   been slowly losing ground. And how many people have you convinced that Oswald   
   was totally innocent    
   of ANYTHING nefarious on 11/22/63? You are in the fringe minority. Boris the   
   Truther disagrees with you. Don Willis disagrees with you. The Toilet   
   disagrees with you. You're a nut, not a researcher.   
      
   > Not a damned thing. And now, as your source of "entertainment" is fading   
   into the sunset, the best you morons can come up with is a daily countdown   
   from 10 by BT George.    
   > I'm surprised that he could count that high.    
      
   I'm surprised you bought a truck online without checking it out first.   
   >    
   > I've got my new newsreader already set up. I've tested it and will be using   
   it starting Feb. 22nd.    
      
   The hobby continues for you.   
      
   > So why would we leave a world wide audience for private messages or private   
   groups ?    
   > That's a stupid move only a knucklehead like you would take.    
      
   You'll post a while longer until you realize it's just you and a couple of   
   other like-minded cranks, and you'll disappear, or rarely post. No one without   
   a newsreader--maybe 99 percent of the online public--will ever see any of your   
   digital flotsam and    
   jetsam.    
   >    
   > In the final analysis, history will show that in the end, you Lone Nutters   
   finally surrendered.    
      
   You never put up a case to examine to "surrender" to, silly Gilly.   
      
   > That when it came to putting your money where your mouths were, your loyalty   
   to your faith wasn't worth a few dollars a month.    
      
   It's not nearly as important to me as it is to you. My identity isn't tied   
   around the delusion of being an influential JFK author or researcher, etc. as   
   yours is. You are the internet mayor of your own Potemkin village, and Ben is   
   your village idiot.   
      
   > I'm not surprised. Cowards are usually quitters and quitters are usually   
   cowards.    
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)