From: sirslick@fast.net
On Friday, February 16, 2024 at 10:01:43 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 18:11:45 -0800 (PST), Chuck Schuyler
> wrote:
>
> >On Thursday, February 15, 2024 at 5:16:36?AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 at 8:20:16?PM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler
wrote:
> >
> >>> Years go, why didn't you guys just set up an email group and Cc each
other about various conspiracy topics if you're not interested in reading what
your critics write?
> >
> >> Because the world has access to Usenet newsgroups. It doesn't have access
to our private conversations.
> >
> >Name a "critic" of yours that you are interested in reading or hearing from.
> None... **ALL** of you are liars and cowards.
You guys have your own little worlds going on.
You`re like those blow up clown punching bags, no matter how hard you are
hit you bounce back up like nothing happened. We get the satisfaction of
punching you in the face, but we don`t get the satisfaction of you staying
down. Still, it was fun
punching you in the face, but for some not worth the price of admission. For
me learning how to operate a new newsreader is enough of a deterrent, I might
not bother if it was free.
> >> We're trying to get our message out to the world, not to each other.
> >
> >What message, Gil? You all have a DIFFERENT point of view.
> Not a single critic denies that there was a conspiracy.
> > Countless websites, blogs, books, articles, YouTube documentaries,
> > movies, television shows, etc. have tackled this subject from all
> > sides, not to mention several MAJOR investigations, and yet you feel
> > YOUR MESSAGE--that some people did something on 11/22/63--needs to get
> > out there?
> You indict yourself.
> >> Why on earth would we go private when we have the usenet ?
> >> That's a pretty stupid question.
> >> > NO ONE except you two and maybe Gentleman Don are going to participate
here after 2/22/24.
> >
> >> Not true. Anyone in the world who has access to Usenet newsgroups using a
newsreader and NNTP server other than Google will be able to participate.
> >
> >You'll block anyone who presses you for an explanation for what happened on
11/22/63.
> How silly!! We're HAPPY to explain what you can't.
When does this start?
> >> You're assuming that no one in the world pays for Usenet newsgroup
access. That's not true.
> >
> >
> >I don't assume that at all. I have read that Usenet has really faded in
popularity.
> Yet you're still here. You destroy your own arguments. How STUPID of
> you!
> >> Plus, our posts to a.c.j. will appear in search engines, while posts in
Google Groups do not.
> >> > In fact, you could set up the email chain NOW or use Messenger on
Facebook or something and not need to deal with any of your critics.
> >> We will be able to see the posts of our opponents who have not been
blocked.
> >
> >Like?
> Stick around and we'll answer your question.
> >> Insulting jackasses like yourself who have nothing of value to contribute
and have no credibility will be blocked. ( from my screen, I can't speak for
Ben )
> >
> >"Of value to contribute" means ...
>
>
> Being able to explain your beliefs.
To who?
Why?
> >> My posts are seen on several different formats, including X ( formerly
Twitter ) , Facebook, several JFK forums and I've appeared more than a half
dozen times on internet podcasts.
> >> My essays and videos have received world-wide exposure. My writings have
been sources for several different authors.
> >> A search for "gil jesus jfk" on any search engine will reveal my
contributions to the JFK assassination community.
> >
> >You've contributed nothing...
>
>
> Lies do not an argument make.
> >> What have you Lone Nutters accomplished in your many years here ?
> >
> >My accomplishments...
>
>
> Can't be seen here.
> >> Not a damned thing. And now, as your source of "entertainment" is fading
into the sunset, the best you morons can come up with is a daily countdown
from 10 by BT George.
> >> I'm surprised that he could count that high.
> >>
> >> I've got my new newsreader already set up. I've tested it and will be
using it starting Feb. 22nd.
> >>
> >> So why would we leave a world wide audience for private messages or
private groups ?
> >> That's a stupid move only a knucklehead like you would take.
> >>
> >> In the final analysis, history will show that in the end, you Lone
Nutters finally surrendered.
> >
> >You never put up a case to examine to "surrender" to...
>
>
> Lies can't convince anyone...
"something happened somehow" is not a case.
> >> That when it came to putting your money where your mouths were, your
loyalty to your faith wasn't worth a few dollars a month.
> >>
> >> I'm not surprised. Cowards are usually quitters and quitters are usually
cowards.
> >
> >Quit what?
> You see? You're incapable of honest debate - you argue the obvious,
> and pretend that you're not quiting the forum.
The forum is quitting Chuck.
> >> And even assholes like yourselves can see that when your insults can't
reach the eyes of your intended targets, it's not worth it.
> >>
> >>> Why wait?
> >>
> >> Why switch when Google is free and still available ?
> (Deleted most of Chuckles logical fallacies...)
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
