From: hsienzant@aol.com   
      
   So you eliminated Whaley simply misspeaking and saying “Neches” when he   
   meant “Neely” exactly how?   
      
   As you admit,   
      
   1. Whaley testified ‘he dropped Oswald off at "Neches and North Beckley”.   
   ‘   
      
   *AND*   
      
   2. “Neches and Beckley did not actually intersect”.   
      
   *AND*   
      
   3. “his 11/22/63 affidavit says the correct intersection was the 500 block   
   of North Beckley.”   
      
   So, me, being a reasonable person and all that that entails, when I put all   
   that together, I conclude Whaley simply mis-spoke, and said “Neches” when   
   he meant “Neely”.   
      
   Big deal.   
      
   And since the revolver in evidence matches the shells in evidence, and the   
   revolver in evidence is traceable to Oswald, and numerous witnesses at the   
   scene said the gunman discarded the shells from his handgun, tossing them   
   aside as he walked away from    
   the crime scene, and since Oswald punched McDonald and drew his handgun on   
   him, and since numerous witnesses picked Oswald out of lineups as the gunman   
   (stuff you don't admit, but an even bigger deal, as this is the kind of stuff   
   a prosecutor takes to    
   trial).   
      
   I sometimes wonder if you're just trolling here, mocking conspiracy   
   “logic” by ignoring the reasonable conclusion and deliberately reaching   
   the most far-fetched conclusion possible.   
      
   But then I remember folks like Mark Lane, Sylvia Meagher, and Harold Weisberg   
   actually published books with conclusions at least as far-fetched as yours.   
      
   > dcw   
      
   Hank   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)