From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Sunday, February 18, 2024 at 7:49:46 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Sunday, February 18, 2024 at 7:24:28 AM UTC-5, Bud wrote:    
   > > Was his timesheet accurate?    
   >    
   > We're talking about the credibility of YOUR witness here.    
      
     He doesn`t belong to me.   
      
   > You claimed that one of the reasons why the witness was credible was because   
   of his, "extremely accurate observations like Oswald wearing a silver   
   bracelet".    
      
     And since that is the right thing, you ignore it.   
      
   > Now you're impugning his credibility by suggesting that he lied about the   
   times on his timesheet ?    
      
     An idiot might think that. A reasonable person would see it as looking at   
   the information correctly, for what it actually is and what it isn`t.   
      
   > If his timesheet was inaccurate, that means he lied on it.    
      
     Post Hoc fallacy. False Dilemma fallacy. Dumb as a stump fallacy.   
       
   > Now tell us what time his timesheet said he picked up Oswald.   
      
     Did Whaley represent the timesheet as being accurate?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)