From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Sunday, February 18, 2024 at 9:16:33 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Sunday, February 18, 2024 at 9:05:09 AM UTC-5, Bud wrote:    
   > > On Sunday, February 18, 2024 at 7:49:46 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:    
   > > > Now tell us what time his timesheet said he picked up Oswald.    
   > > Did Whaley represent the timesheet as being accurate?   
   > I've asked you my question first and until you answer it, I'm not going to   
   answer yours.    
      
      I don`t care what you do. You can look at the wrong things incorrectly all   
   you like.   
      
     I will choose to look at the information correctly, and in that way I will   
   be able to figure out things that will keep you stumped forever.   
      
    Like the timesheet. Do you really think that Whaley always picked up   
   passengers at precise times like "6:20, 7:50, 8:10, 8:20, 9:40, 10:50, or   
   3:10" (quoting you on the Education Forum), or is it more reasonable to   
   believe these were rough, ballpark    
   figures where no real attempt was made at accuracy?   
      
     This is how reasoning people use information. Like this...   
      
   Oswald was seen in the TSBD about such and such a time. It would take him   
   about this long to leave the building and walk to the bus. He was seen on the   
   bus. He was seen leaving the bus. It would take him about this long to walk to   
   the cab station. He was    
   seen at the cab station. It would take the cab about this long to get to the   
   vicinity of the boardinghouse. He was seen at the boarding house. Ect.    
      
     You can`t string information together like this (even after decades), you   
   can only make pretend you are nullifying the information.   
      
     But you can believe whatever you like. You can hold up an obviously forged   
   memo as significant while pretending the BY photo is faked if you like, it is   
   a free country. Your ideas and your opinions are meaningless because they are   
   not the product of    
   reasoning and critical thinking, they are the product of silly game playing.   
      
   > I'm going to do what Ben does. I'm going to keep asking you the same   
   question over and over until you answer it.    
      
     Then you are going to use the same cowardly tactic Ben uses to avoid   
   engaging on ideas. The fact is that neither of you could discuss ideas   
   honestly if your lives depended on it. You have to play silly games where you   
   isolate on a talking point, and    
   that is all that is allowed to be focused on, everything else must be ignored.   
   Can you show that this is a valid approach to get to the truth?   
      
   > What time does Whaley's timesheet say he picked up Oswald ?    
      
     Don`t know, don`t care. I`m not using that time in support of any ideas.   
      
   > Any response other than a time proves your running from the question.    
      
     An idiot who frames things in a way they find comfortable might think that.   
   '    
   > When you answer my question, then I'll answer yours.   
      
     Don`t care what you do.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)