From: hsienzant@aol.com   
      
   On Monday, February 19, 2024 at 8:15:10 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Monday, February 19, 2024 at 8:05:32 AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:    
   > > What part of “ I don't put the correct time on the sheet because they   
   don't require it, sir, but anywhere approximate. ” didn't you understand?   
   > What part of 15 intervals don't YOU understand ?    
   > A 12:47 fare logged in at 12:30 ?    
   >    
   > 12:47 is approximate to 12:30 ?    
   > You're full of shit as usual Hank.   
      
   Hello! 12:30 is a fifteen-minute interval.    
      
   Whaley didn't pick up Oswald at 12:30, he testified all his logged times were   
   *approximations*.   
      
   12:47 is likewise an approximation, by the Commission. Nobody was following   
   Oswald around with a stopwatch (although some CTs might argue otherwise).   
      
   Gil, please explain:   
      
   “ If ‘they’ were intent on framing Oswald, why didn't they recreate the   
   log sheet with better times for the ‘frameup’?   
      
   Why not have Whaley testify he picked up Oswald at 12:47, and produce a   
   timesheet that showed exactly that?   
      
   You are either a great investigator who uncovered a massive — but incredibly   
   stupid — group of conspirators or someone who is so wedded to the idea of a   
   conspiracy they can't see the glaring problems with their theory.”   
      
   Ditto with your other CTs on this board.   
      
   Ben to delete my arguments and change the subject, blaming me for things I   
   never said.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)