Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.jfk    |    Discussing the assassination of JFK    |    99,700 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 99,643 of 99,700    |
|    Hank Sienzant to Ben Holmes    |
|    Re: Has Anyone Noticed? (Huckster Can't     |
|    20 Feb 24 11:02:08    |
      From: hsienzant@aol.com              On Monday, February 12, 2024 at 9:37:15 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:       > Huckster has recently doubled down on his "explanation" for the        > contradicting documents regarding the paper in the "paper sack."        >        > He pretends that someone merely typed up two possible variants of the        > test results in advance.        >        > Of course, anyone who'd bothered to READ this citation:        >        > https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Proof_the_FBI_Change       _Documents_and_Vincent_Bugliosi_Was_Wrong.html        >        > ... knows that such a theory is dead in the water from the beginning.        >        > Clearly, either Huckster is a moron beyond belief, or he didn't bother        > reading the citation.        >        > And... as is his habit when I prove him a liar... Huckster will run.        >        > As he does...        >        > EVERY        >        > SINGLE        >        > TIME!!!              Ball is still in your court as I explained here:       https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/0AImUcgnD3E/m/9yUg0rO5AQAJ       “Explain why. Quote the passage that you claim makes my argument “dead in       the water”       Go ahead. We’ll wait.”              Still waiting!              Repeating the same claim ad infinitum is not the same thing as proving your       claim.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca