From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Wednesday, February 21, 2024 at 6:41:38 PM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:   
   > I LIED!!!    
      
      I thought that was premature, you should have rode the horse over the cliff.   
       
   > I have been lurking off and on and continue to be amused by the silly    
   > offerings from the conspiracy hobbyists. We have Don Willis whose SOP is    
   > to take an obscure fact, draw an illogical conclusion from it while ignoring    
   > all other possible explanations for it, then take that illogical conclusion   
   and    
   > draw an equally illogical conclusion, and so on and so on. In short, Don is   
   a    
   > very silly man.    
   >    
   > Then we have Giltardo, who seems to have no interest in determining what    
   > did happen been seems obsessed with convincing us what did happen isn't    
   > what really happened. Since all the credible evidence indicates Oswald    
   > committed a double murder on 11/22/1963, Gil's mission is to come up with    
   > excuses for why we should disregard each and every piece of that evidence.    
   > To that end, he will apply rules of evidence that did not exist in 1963 or   
   more    
   > likely, he will invent rules of evidence that have never applied anywhere at    
   > any time. If Gil's rules of evidence were ever to be adopted, it would be   
   very    
   > difficult to convict anybody of any crime. Gil has recently given us an    
   > example of how Gil looks at evidence with a video that argues the fatal    
   > headshot was fired from in front of JFK. The video starts off humorously    
   > with Beverly Oliver who claims to have been the Babushka Lady who was    
   > filming the assassination from the grassy strip between Main and Elm Sts.    
   > What makes this claim remarkable is that at the time, Beverly Oliver was   
   only    
   > 17 years old. But just for grins, let's accept that she was Babushka Lady.   
   He    
   > claims to have been looking at the assassination through the viewfinder. Gil    
   > thinks he perspective is a better indication of the direction of the   
   headshot    
   > that the unanimous opinion of the forensic pathologists who reviewed the    
   > medical evidence. Gil cites other witnesses who saw JFK's head explode in    
   > a split second and thinks they are a more credible source than the medical    
   > examiners who all concluded the headshot struck from behind. Every last    
   > one of them. Here's the inconvenient truth for Gil. When I high powered   
   bullet    
   > passes through the wall of a skull, fracture lines radiate from the point of    
   > entry. Secondary fracture lines form perpendicular to the radiating   
   fractures.    
   > That happens 100% of the time. The radiating fracture lines all emerge from    
   > the point of entry on the BACK of JFK's head leaving no doubt the headshot    
   > struck JFK from behind. But of course, that is not the conclusion Giltardo    
   > wants to believe so he invents excuses why we should not accept that    
   > inconvenient fact. In short, Gil is a very silly many engaged in a very   
   silly and    
   > pointless hobby, as are all conspiracy hobbyists everywhere.    
   >    
   > This really is my last post since Google is going to slam the door on new    
   > posts. In the few hours this group can still be accessed by Google users,   
   I'll    
   > monitor whatever responses are made to this post and others, but this is    
   > definitely adios for me.   
      
     I`m not sure whether posting will be allowed tomorrow if today is the last.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)