Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.jfk    |    Discussing the assassination of JFK    |    99,700 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 99,669 of 99,700    |
|    NoTrueFlags Here to Donald Willis    |
|    Re: Why Whaley separates Neely & N. Beck    |
|    21 Feb 24 21:52:10    |
      From: notrueflagshere@gmail.com              On Thursday, February 22, 2024 at 12:09:13 AM UTC-5, Donald Willis wrote:       > Why Whaley separates Neely & N. Beckley from "500 block"        >        > Q: Why does William Whaley, in the "Four Days in November" video segment,       say, "So I carried [Oswald] off across the viaduct, turned left at the 500       block of North Beckley, and when I got over on N. Beckley came on the       intersection of Neely, North        Beckley?? The left turn onto Beckley from the viaduct is at the 1000 block,       the block of Oswald's rooming house, not the 500 block.        >        > A: Because Oswald improvised a last-minute change of destination. As       recorded in Whaley's manifest, Oswald initially told him to take him to the       500 block of Beckley. But while Whaley was turning left onto Beckley, Oswald       saw that there were no patrol        cars in front of the rooming house, hence no need for Whaley to travel five       more blocks, south to Neely, the actual 500 block on N. Beckley. So he tells       Whaley "This will do fine", and Whaley deposits him there, on the sidewalk       opposite the rooming house.        Whaley then, as noted above, thinks that the 1000 block was the 500 block, as       per Oswald's *original* instruction, because the taciturn Oswald (as Whaley       describes him) does not tell him otherwise.        >        > Hence, also, this exchange at the hearings:        >        > Ball: You drove until you reached the 500 block, or not?        > Whaley: No, sir. I didn't drive until I reached the 500 block. I drove until       I reached Beckley & Neely. (4/8/64 testimony)        >        > Oswald has, no doubt, been kindly informed--probably more than once--that       the 500 block and Neely are one and the same thing. But his actual experience       is that he let Oswald out at N. Beckley near Neches, the 1000 block--where       Oswald said, "This will        do fine"--and that that location has been imprinted on his mind. Hence, the       separation, in his mind of "500 block" and "Neely & Beckley".        >        > Import: Oswald did not walk back the five blocks to the rooming house from       Neely. He just walked across the street, after Whaley let him out at the (in       Whaley's mind) "500 block". So the timeline for his supposed walk from the       rooming house to 10th &        Patton is reduced by a corresponding four or five minutes, to about 1:11. By       1:15 or 1:16, then, Oswald is nearing the Texas Theatre, not arriving at 10th       & Patton.        >        > dcw       It seems that the Whaley story originally was designed to explain how Oswald       got to 1026 North Beckley, so Neches did the job. But then adjustments were       made. Oswald asked to be delivered to the 500 block, but said, "This is fine,"       at Neches. Neches        later became Neeley to make the Official Times work out. Maybe.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca