home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.jfk      Discussing the assassination of JFK      99,700 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 99,669 of 99,700   
   NoTrueFlags Here to Donald Willis   
   Re: Why Whaley separates Neely & N. Beck   
   21 Feb 24 21:52:10   
   
   From: notrueflagshere@gmail.com   
      
   On Thursday, February 22, 2024 at 12:09:13 AM UTC-5, Donald Willis wrote:   
   > Why Whaley separates Neely & N. Beckley from "500 block"    
   >    
   > Q: Why does William Whaley, in the "Four Days in November" video segment,   
   say, "So I carried [Oswald] off across the viaduct, turned left at the 500   
   block of North Beckley, and when I got over on N. Beckley came on the   
   intersection of Neely, North    
   Beckley?? The left turn onto Beckley from the viaduct is at the 1000 block,   
   the block of Oswald's rooming house, not the 500 block.    
   >    
   > A: Because Oswald improvised a last-minute change of destination. As   
   recorded in Whaley's manifest, Oswald initially told him to take him to the   
   500 block of Beckley. But while Whaley was turning left onto Beckley, Oswald   
   saw that there were no patrol    
   cars in front of the rooming house, hence no need for Whaley to travel five   
   more blocks, south to Neely, the actual 500 block on N. Beckley. So he tells   
   Whaley "This will do fine", and Whaley deposits him there, on the sidewalk   
   opposite the rooming house.   
    Whaley then, as noted above, thinks that the 1000 block was the 500 block, as   
   per Oswald's *original* instruction, because the taciturn Oswald (as Whaley   
   describes him) does not tell him otherwise.    
   >    
   > Hence, also, this exchange at the hearings:    
   >    
   > Ball: You drove until you reached the 500 block, or not?    
   > Whaley: No, sir. I didn't drive until I reached the 500 block. I drove until   
   I reached Beckley & Neely. (4/8/64 testimony)    
   >    
   > Oswald has, no doubt, been kindly informed--probably more than once--that   
   the 500 block and Neely are one and the same thing. But his actual experience   
   is that he let Oswald out at N. Beckley near Neches, the 1000 block--where   
   Oswald said, "This will    
   do fine"--and that that location has been imprinted on his mind. Hence, the   
   separation, in his mind of "500 block" and "Neely & Beckley".    
   >    
   > Import: Oswald did not walk back the five blocks to the rooming house from   
   Neely. He just walked across the street, after Whaley let him out at the (in   
   Whaley's mind) "500 block". So the timeline for his supposed walk from the   
   rooming house to 10th &    
   Patton is reduced by a corresponding four or five minutes, to about 1:11. By   
   1:15 or 1:16, then, Oswald is nearing the Texas Theatre, not arriving at 10th   
   & Patton.    
   >    
   > dcw   
   It seems that the Whaley story originally was designed to explain how Oswald   
   got to 1026 North Beckley, so Neches did the job. But then adjustments were   
   made. Oswald asked to be delivered to the 500 block, but said, "This is fine,"   
   at Neches. Neches    
   later became Neeley to make the Official Times work out. Maybe.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca