From: brightraven2007@yahoo.co.uk   
      
   On Wednesday, 28 October 1998 09:00:00 UTC+1, geoff steuart  wrote:   
   > We should all know who Brenda Well's is.  There seems to be intense   
   > excitement whenever her name is mentioned, usually followed by such   
   > accolades as 'the witness of the century', 'the key to the whole case'.     
   >    
   > Brenda was allegedly first reported missing by Agence France-Presse on   
   > September 21st, 1997 and has not been seen since.  According to the Sunday   
   > Mirror, the husband of Brenda Well's, codenamed Marcel, was quoted as   
   > saying,   
   >    
   > "We have been forced to go into hiding"   
   >    
   > The reasons why remain a mystery. 'Marcel' has not come out of hiding to   
   > update us.   
   >    
   > I have already shown that, contrary to what some contributors believe,   
   > Brenda's location when the crash occurred, is unkown.  This will remain the   
   > case    
   >  until she comes out of hiding and clarifies this very important factor.   
   >    
   > I have also shown that a metamorphosis has quietly taken place over this   
   > issue - speculation has evolved into fact - with no empirical data to   
   > warrant such a change. But the enhancements don't end there.  From some   
   > articles republished on this NG, it is obvious that Brenda Well's testimony   
   > has been altered, giving her remarks a different meaning.    
   >    
   > We should refresh our memories on the subject of Brenda's remarks,   
   >    
   > 'After  a party with my friends, I was returning to my home. A motorbike   
   > with two men forced me off the road. It was following a big car.   
   > Afterwards in the tunnel there were very strong lights like flashes. After   
   > that, a black car arrived. The big car had come off the road. I stopped   
   > and five or six motorbikes arrived and started taking photographs. They   
   > were crying 'It's Diana.'.   
   >    
   > Now, in a recent article republished by Kitty(I understand she is not the   
   > author) and with a date confirmed by her as late September 1997, we find   
   > this little ditty about Brenda Well's.  Please read it carefully,   
   >    
   > 'she was going onto this slip road  in front of the Alma tunnel, when she   
   > was forced off the road by the motorcycles involved in Diana's accident and   
   > death.  WHAT WE NOW UNDERSTAND IS THAT WHEN THIS HAPPENED DIANA'S CAR DID   
   > NOT YET PASS HER.  SECONDS LATER, THE MERCEDES PASSED NOW FOLLOWED BY THE   
   > TWO MOTORCYCLES(My emphasis - GS)'   
   > Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.   
   >    
   > I also want to draw the attention of the reader to the following article   
   > which can be found on the Web dated 17th Oct. 1997,   
   >    
   > ' The intervention team was waiting for the Mercedes off the main road.   
   > Once the car was moving to enter the Alma tunnel, one of the motorcycles,   
   > during the early morning hours, of a holiday weekend, forced Brenda Wells   
   > car off the slip road, the black car passed and the Mercedes moved toward   
   > entering the Alma tunnel with the black car, and two motorcycles merging   
   > around it.'   
   > From: JB Ehrlich, Geopolitical Analyst, Sender, Berl & Sons    
   > To: Internet guests to our Princess Diana analysis web pages    
   > Re: Interim interpretation and assessment   
   > Date: October 17, 1997   
   >    
   > Now I don't want to spoil the party guys but what is said here is   
   > completely different from what Brenda said she saw.  According to the   
   > 'understanding', a couple of extra motorbikes have materialized.  Compare   
   > the quotations.   
   >    
   > Brenda clearly states that the 'motorbike with two men' which forced her   
   > off the road was following the Mercedes.  How can this be squared with the   
   > late September article which clearly has motorbikes operating independently   
   > and as the Mercedes APPROACHED?!   All of this is clearly implied by the   
   > statement 'Diana's car did not yet pass her'.  In this scenario, we have   
   > motorcycles, then Mercedes, then motorcycles.    
   >    
   > Where did this 'new understanding' come from?  Has Brenda Well's added to   
   > her statements from hiding?  If so, why haven't we been furnished with the   
   > details.  If Brenda has not  been heard from, who provided these extra   
   > details? This question really needs some kind of answer.   
   >    
   > What is absolutely staggering, is that Brenda's description of the event,   
   > can be explained quiet rationally, in prosaic terms.  For instance she   
   > makes reference to two men on a motorbike following the Mercedes.  As I   
   > have argued elsewhere, according to the evidence, Darmon and Rat could have   
   > been no more than 4-10 seconds behind, with Christian Martinez and Serge   
   > Arnal seconds behind them in a black fiat uno.  Why shouldn't Darmon and   
   > Rat be the two men on the bike, and Martinez and Arnal  the occupants of   
   > the ' black car' that Brenda makes reference to?   
   >    
   > Much is made of Brenda Well's meager testimony.  Almost an entire   
   > assassination theory has been erected upon these feeble foundations.  The   
   > treatment of Brenda by this NG, has exposed some pretty poor research   
   > techniques.  Hopefully, this post and others will address this situation.   
   >    
   > Geoff.   
      
      
      
   On Wednesday, 28 October 1998 09:00:00 UTC+1, geoff steuart  wrote:   
   > We should all know who Brenda Well's is.  There seems to be intense   
   > excitement whenever her name is mentioned, usually followed by such   
   > accolades as 'the witness of the century', 'the key to the whole case'.     
   >    
   > Brenda was allegedly first reported missing by Agence France-Presse on   
   > September 21st, 1997 and has not been seen since.  According to the Sunday   
   > Mirror, the husband of Brenda Well's, codenamed Marcel, was quoted as   
   > saying,   
   >    
   > "We have been forced to go into hiding"   
   >    
   > The reasons why remain a mystery. 'Marcel' has not come out of hiding to   
   > update us.   
   >    
   > I have already shown that, contrary to what some contributors believe,   
   > Brenda's location when the crash occurred, is unkown.  This will remain the   
   > case    
   >  until she comes out of hiding and clarifies this very important factor.   
   >    
   > I have also shown that a metamorphosis has quietly taken place over this   
   > issue - speculation has evolved into fact - with no empirical data to   
   > warrant such a change. But the enhancements don't end there.  From some   
   > articles republished on this NG, it is obvious that Brenda Well's testimony   
   > has been altered, giving her remarks a different meaning.    
   >    
   > We should refresh our memories on the subject of Brenda's remarks,   
   >    
   > 'After  a party with my friends, I was returning to my home. A motorbike   
   > with two men forced me off the road. It was following a big car.   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)