XPost: uk.politics.misc, uk.current-events.general, uk.people.consumers   
   XPost: alt.politics.british   
   From: alan@spamddandd.com   
      
   On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 12:07:29 +0100, banana   
    wrote:   
      
   >In article , Alan Ferris   
   > writes   
   >>On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:20:23 +0100, banana   
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>In article , Alan Ferris   
   >>> writes   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:56:24 +0100, banana   
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>as a government worker I have no political allegiances.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>In saying that, you express one - to the State and the business   
   >>>>>interests that own it.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>'I believe that as a government worker, I should be a complete zombie'   
   >>>>>sounds closer to the mark. Which is an insult to those who work for the   
   >>>>>government and actually have sufficient working class consciousness to   
   >>>>>engage in struggle...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Why is it that 99 times out of 100, when someone says "As a ..., I...",   
   >>>>>they mean "Being a complete moron, I..." ? Something to do with   
   >>>>>role/identity...   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Well the foolish are constantly needing to tell other what they said   
   >>>>rather than being able to comprehend what the person actually   
   >>>>wrote....I assume therefore that you do that often.   
   >>>   
   >>>What you said was this:   
   >>>   
   >>> "as a government worker I have no political allegiances".   
   >>>   
   >>>Imagine saying that and calling someone else foolish!   
   >>>   
   >>>As for 'assume', I think you meant 'conclude' or 'deduce'. Which would   
   >>>leave the statement only a little less idiotic.   
   >>   
   >>I apologise, I did not realise it was your ability to comprehend   
   >>English that was the problem. Tell me which is your first language   
   >>and I will attempt to have it translated to something you can   
   >>understand.   
   >   
   >I just kicked your idiotic statement around the floor - a statement   
   >which marks you out to be exactly what I and others have called you.   
   >   
   >Rather than replying substantively, you retort with this pathetic   
   >attempt at a put-down. You're caught out using the word 'assume' without   
   >knowing what it means, and you start saying I don't know English.   
   >   
   >Something wrong with your self-image there!   
   >   
   >You repeatedly use the word 'comprehend'. Are you sure you know the   
   >difference between it and 'understand'? Or do you just think   
   >'comprehend' makes you sound as if you've got big bollocks? What a twit.   
      
   Awwwwwwwww......when you have left the school yard, let me know, I   
   thought you an adult until you little temper tantrum. All because   
   you do not understand "as a government worker I have no political   
   allegiances".   
      
      
   --   
   Alan "Ferrit" Ferris   
      
    ()'.'.'()   
    ( (T) )   
    ( ) . ( )   
    (")_(")   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|