home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.princess-diana      What really happened to Lady Di...      10,071 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 8,114 of 10,071   
   Stephen Glynn to All   
   Re: Will celebrating the Molly Maguires    
   27 Sep 05 15:21:32   
   
   XPost: ie.politics, uk.politics.misc, alt.politics.british   
   XPost: uk.current-events.terrorism   
   From: stephen.glynn@ntlworld.com   
      
   Howard9 wrote:   
   > In article ,   
   > stephen.glynn@ntlworld.com says...   
   >   
   >   
   >>SNIPPED   
   >>I strongly suspect that this proposed offence is there to be dropped as   
   >>a pseudo-concession for retaining equally unpleasant stuff like allowing   
   >>terrorist suspects to be held for three months without charge.   
   >>   
   >   
   >   
   > A lot of technical mumbo jumbo with little or no argument about the core   
   > principles of the issue.   
   >   
   > Try putting an argument for or against the principles instead of making   
   > an idiotic argument based on claimed inconsistencies in draft   
   > legislation.   
   >   
   > I personally believe that glorifying terrorist murders is the same as   
   > incitement to further terrorism and murder.  So I support completely any   
   > law that competently deal with this situation.   
   > Existing laws cannot do so because they were introduced long before this   
   > kind of extreme situation was ever thought of. If existing laws could be   
   > reformed then fine.  But reforming complex laws has a poor record and   
   > introducing replacement laws is usually a better route.   
   >   
   > If you don't agree then put your argument - without the hyperbole and   
   > bluster.   
   >   
      
   Clearly you *don't* believe that glorifying terrorist murders is the   
   same as either incitement to terrorism or soliciting to murder, both of   
   which are already illegal; if you genuinely thought there was no   
   difference, you'd think there was no need for this proposed legislation.   
      
   What do you say isn't caught by existing offences that ought to be   
   caught, and why?   
      
   Steve   
      
   --   
      
      
   "It has been said," he began at length, withdrawing his eyes   
        reluctantly from an usually large insect upon the ceiling and   
        addressing himself to the maiden, "that there are few   
        situations in life that cannot be honourably settled, and   
        without any loss of time, either by suicide, a bag of gold, or   
        by thrusting a despised antagonist over the edge of a   
        precipice on a dark night."   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca