XPost: ie.politics, uk.politics.misc, alt.politics.british   
   XPost: uk.current-events.terrorism   
   From: banana@REMOVE_THIS.borve.demon.co.uk   
      
   In article , Howard9   
    writes   
   >In article ,   
   >banana@REMOVE_THIS.borve.demon.co.uk says...   
   >> In article , Howard9   
   >>  writes   
   >>   
   >> >In article <3QS_e.5881$DO.3842@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net>,   
   >> >stephen.glynn@ntlworld.com says...   
   >> >> banana wrote:   
   >> >> > In article , Howard9   
   >> >> >  writes   
   >>   
   >> >> >>In article ,   
   >> >> >>stephen.glynn@ntlworld.com says...   
   >>   
   >> >I see no basis for this argument.  It makes perfect sense for terrorism   
   >> >to be treated differently to ordinary crime/murder.   
   >>   
   >> And your definition of the former is...?   
   >>   
   >> Careful - you wouldn't want it to include anything that State oficials   
   >> have been exposed as ordering, having blamed it on someone else, would   
   >> you?   
   >   
   >Why   Oh yes.. of course you don't recognise the state terrorism that   
   >was sponsored and carried out by Saddam - because you preferred him to   
   >the liberation of the 25 million people he brutalised, abused, mass   
   >murdered and mass raped.   
      
   Does that mean you won't think about what definition you might use?   
      
   --   
   banana     "The thing I hate about you, Rowntree, is the way you   
               give Coca-Cola to your scum, and your best teddy-bear to   
               Oxfam, and expect us to lick your frigid fingers for the   
               rest of your frigid life." (Mick Travis, 'If...', 1968)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)