XPost: uk.politics.parliament, uk.politics.misc, uk.legal   
   From: david@election.demon.co.uk   
      
   In article <9R0AYUbLc+PDFwpt@anywhere.demon.co.uk>,   
    Robert Henderson  wrote:   
   > In message , David   
   > Boothroyd  writes   
   > >In article <+ADQsNTWZ9PDFw5G@anywhere.demon.co.uk>,   
   > > Robert Henderson  wrote:   
   > >> In message , David   
   > >> Boothroyd  writes   
   > >> > >So you admit your opportunism. Fair enough.   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> Surely as a New Labour person, you'd take your hat off to anyone's   
   > >> >> opportunism!   
   > >> >   
   > >> >One might have a sneaking respect if Henderson was open about his   
   > >> >agenda, but he isn't, and that just makes him a slimy git.   
   > >>   
   > >> NuLabcur admission  that   opportunism is government policy.   
   > >   
   > >Really? Where?   
   >   
   > You tacitly accepted it was official NuLabcur policy by not denying   
   > this: "Surely as a New Labour person, you'd take your hat off to   
   > anyone's opportunism! "   
   >   
   > Sigh.  NuLabcur brains! RH   
      
   Is this the new logic? Anything not directly denied is tacitly   
   accepted? If so then you must by definition be an obsessive   
   crackpot, having never directly denied Mike Marqusee's description   
   of you thus which was originally made in 1995.   
      
   --   
   http://www.election.demon.co.uk   
   "We can also agree that Saddam Hussein most certainly has chemical and biolog-   
   ical weapons and is working towards a nuclear capability. The dossier contains   
   confirmation of information that we either knew or most certainly should have   
   been willing to assume." - Menzies Campbell, 24th September 2002.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)