From: steuart@btinternet.com   
      
   "banana"  wrote in message   
      
      
   > >> That is a very twisty statement. Symptoms such as headache often appear   
   > >> by 10%, and while some sources give 20% as the threshold for actual   
   > >> poisoning, others give 10%:   
   > >   
   > >As I said, the symptoms of CO poisoning occur at 20% saturation.  Thanks   
   for   
   > >the confirmation!!   
   >   
   > What's the matter with you? Symptoms of said poisoning are widely stated   
   > to occur at 10%.   
   >   
      
   Your own words 'while some sources give 20%'.   
      
   Your link proves that the sample could not have come from a suicide.  Twist   
   and turn as much as you like.   
      
      
      
   > You were trying to say that Henri Paul had a level of 21% without   
   > showing symptoms of illness. I banged that on the head - although of   
   > course it's been banged on the head many times before.   
      
   No it hasn't.  The wild claims of the  conspiracy underground,   do not   
   maketh a fact.   
      
   >   
   > The idea that the blood sample wasn't from Henri Paul doesn't rest on   
   > the idea that it came from a suicide victim, or even from another body   
   > in the mortuary. Whatever it might say in the 'Daily Express'.   
      
   The Express has been recyling Fayed's nonsense.   
   >   
   > >Banana pastes the evidence which seems to   
   > >back him up, then quitely snips the evidence which blows a big hole in   
   his   
   > >case.  Notice unconsciousness at 40-50% saturation and death at 60-70%   
   > >saturation. Conclusion: the sample could not have come from a suicide   
   > >victim.   
   >   
   > Your conclusion is totally wrong.   
      
   My conclusion is totally right even based on banana's evidence.   
      
    >Rich has shown why.   
      
   I saw his intervention, nothing more than a collection of speculations with   
   no evidence to back it up.   
      
    Haven't you heard   
   > of people who take some pills, or slit their wrists, *and* rig their   
   > exhaust pipes up to the inside of their cars?   
      
   Don't care.   
   >   
   > >> >Prior to the accident, the investigation showed that HP had a   
   background   
   > >> >level - caused by his smoking habit - of 12%.   
   > >>   
   > >> Do you mean the sample said to have been taken from a femoral vein   
   which   
   > >> showed 12.8%?   
   > >   
   > >Yes   
   >   
   > Well why say "prior to the accident"?   
      
   Bad grammar.   
      
   >   
   >    
   >   
   > >> I haven't heard of any blood sample taken from him before the crash   
   > >> which was analysed afterwards - or indeed beforehand - for   
   > >> carboxhaemoglobin.   
   > >   
   > >Neither have I.   
   >   
   > Is that your way of apologising for writing the above sentence beginning   
   > with the words "prior to the accident"? I already knew your manners were   
   > atrocious.   
      
   You think my manners are atracious, you must be having a fucking laugh.  Why   
   should I appologise for a grammatical error, to a small minded moron like   
   you.   
      
   >   
   > >> >His alcohol level was   
   > >> >equivalent  to 4 double wiskeys.  HP was used to drinking, he'd been   
   > >treated   
   > >> >by his GP for alcoholism.   
   > >>   
   > >> And how would you know if the spooks had faked such 'evidence'?   
   > >   
   > >It's your fantastic claim.  It's up to you to prove it.   
   >   
   > Is it? That sounds like the 'never believe anything nasty about the   
   > ruling class unless there's corroborating evidence from 300 witnesses'   
   > school of falsification.   
      
   Exactly - unable to respond.   
      
   more of banana's gibberish.   
      
   Geoff.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)