From: bern.boergeenreclame@planet.nl   
      
   "Rachel Spencer"  schreef in bericht   
   news:1134010576.345302.37630@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...   
      
   [snip]   
      
   >  The Inquest will be done sooner   
   > rather than later.  If it is later I'm sure you and your cronies are   
   > shitting in your pants.  If Stevens' is an honest man then royals and   
   > their kind are screwed.   
      
   Actually, Lord Stevens isn't the Coroner in charge of the Inquest, that is   
   M.J.C.Burgess. Let's assume that Rachel means Mr Burgess. Only when he   
   reaches the conclusion that she wants him to reach, he is an honest man,   
   according to her. Conspiracy theorising at its worst. Because if Mr Burgess,   
   as he will, concludes that "our Princess" died as the result of high speed,   
   King Alcohol and a lover of the day who ordered his driver to speed, he   
   cannot be an honest man. If there is no evidence to support the various   
   conspiracy theories around and if there are mountains of evidence to support   
   the conclusion that a "simple" car crash took place, an unbiased mind   
   accepts the evidence. The difference between fantasy world and real life.   
      
   The idea that people with a mindset like Rachel Spencer can get on juries in   
   the USA frightens me. Poor defendants!   
      
   Bernhard   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)