From: banana@REMOVE_THIS.borve.demon.co.uk   
      
   In article <1134218852.524179.128180@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,   
   Rachel Spencer  writes   
      
   >" 'Accidentalists' have only tried to say that its driver and any   
   >passengers may have had 'various' reasons for 'not coming forward'..."   
   >And just what could those reasons be?   
      
   And how could someone who merely didn't want his mum or wife knowing   
   where he was, for example, or a petty criminal who didn't fancy calling   
   the police, or someone who was mysteriously stricken with amnesia, have   
   driven to the centre of Paris without the car's licence plate being   
   caught on any camera available to the authorities???   
      
   The only reasonable answer is that this would be impossible.   
   Highly-organised foul play was obviously involved. But some of the   
   'accidentalists' can keep straight faces and tell us we are completely   
   mad to think so. What phonies they are!   
      
   --   
   banana     "The thing I hate about you, Rowntree, is the way you   
               give Coca-Cola to your scum, and your best teddy-bear to   
               Oxfam, and expect us to lick your frigid fingers for the   
               rest of your frigid life." (Mick Travis, 'If...', 1968)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)