XPost: uk.politics.misc, uk.media, uk.local.hertfordshire   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order   
   From: No_4@dsl.pipex.com   
      
   banana wrote:   
    >   
   >>  As for objectivity, all I can see is   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>The police issued a statement saying that they are treating the incident as   
   an   
   >>>accident as opposed to a terrorist attack.   
   >>   
   >>which means they have no evidence of what caused it, so are treating it as   
   >>an accident.  Strikes me as reporting objectively.   
   >   
   > Do you realise that you just said that the police said something,   
   > therefore it must be true?   
      
       I certainly did *NOT* say that.   
      
       What I said was that the report reported what the police said (of   
   course, that could all be lies, as coudl everythign you, and I, have   
   written).  I'm only commenting on the reporting, not what the police said.   
      
       Stop infering through your prejudice and attributing it to me.   
      
      
   --   
                 Just because I've written it doesn't mean that   
                      either you or I have to believe it.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)