XPost: uk.politics.misc, uk.media, uk.local.hertfordshire   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order   
   From: no@no.com   
      
   "banana"  wrote in message   
   news:Sh1MwXAStqnDFwP2@borve.demon.co.uk...   
   > In article <1134463544.597946.303670@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,   
   > parris_k@yahoo.com writes   
   >   
   > >Not at all, however, they don't answer any of the questions I posed. It   
   > >seems yo ucan't answer them either, but I'll give you another chance to   
   > >avoid looking quite so stupid   
   > >"banana"  wrote in message   
   > >news:$Cs3otA3OZnDFwY2@borve.demon.co.uk...   
   > >> In article , tw    
   writes   
   > >> >"banana"  wrote in message   
   > >> >news:IVWKNLAfwOnDFwuk@borve.demon.co.uk...   
   >   
   >    
      
      
      
      
   >   
   > >I did. Now, are you going to tell me what bizarre synaptic process   
   > >caused   
   > >you to link a crash in Tehran with an explosion in Hertfordshire?   
   >   
   > If you want me to help you, try not being so rude.   
      
   I'm trying to help YOU.. though you don't seem to realise..   
      
   >   
   > I''ll break up what follows into short paragraphs for you, though.   
   >   
   > Rather than sitting in front of the telly forgetting what you heard and   
   > saw 2 days ago, but repeating what you saw and heard 2 minutes ago as if   
   > anything else would be completely mad, try asking questions, e.g. about   
   > what is connected to what, and what underlies what.   
      
   I did. What bizarre synaptic process cause you to link a crash in Tehran   
   with an explosion in Herts?   
   How (in your opinion) is one connected to the other?   
      
   >   
   > That's required for a move towards sanity, thinking for yourself, and   
   > understanding, in the face of the present totalitarian conditions. Get   
   > into the habit.   
   >   
   > Rest snipped.   
      
      
   Rest restored, as it shows how shy you are about answering direct   
   questions..   
      
   > >What does the Iranian airforce's policy of flying 30 year old   
   > >machines it can't get any spare parts for (due to informing the   
   > >manufacturers that it wished to see their nation wiped off the map)   
      
   > Er that was a few days ago, not 30 years ago.   
      
   I'm talking about the age of the aircraft, not the accident.   
      
   > I don't know whether you read Farsi but I wouldn't be surprised if the   
   reference was to a regime,   
   > not a nation.   
      
   "Death to America!" seems fairly unequivocable to most people.   
      
   > Thus the opponents of apartheid in South Africa didn't   
   > want to murder all the whites. Get it? Anyway, from now on, get your own   
   > clue.   
      
   I always have done and will continue to do so. Yours appear to be as useful   
   as tits on a boar.   
      
   > >have to do with anything?   
      
   See? You simply can't answer anything factual can you?   
   Once again, what does the crash of a 30 year old,poorly maintained   
   Iranian   
   aircraft have to do with an explosion in Herts?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)