XPost: uk.politics.misc, alt.politics.british, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.america, alt.conspira   
   y.america-at-war   
   XPost: us.politics   
   From: Donotemail@pipex.com   
      
   Apols, my response to your ambiguous post was assumptive.   
      
   The illusion of freedom is what it's all about, and anyone who protests that   
   it is an illusion could now be a target.   
      
   Plus, invisible laws now bring more people into line, unless they are making   
   the laws.   
      
   "Vincent J. Hrovat"  wrote in message   
   news:12n9q15h0jaoukbluvtv06mlfsmde1rcso@4ax.com...   
   > Actually, i thought that the word "Kafkaesque" was an excellent summation   
   > of the   
   > contents.  Would be interested in hearing your assessment/opinion, if you   
   > have   
   > one.   
   >   
   >   
   > In a previous post, "Scarfman"  said:   
   >   
   >>   
   >>Always interesting how people focus on the presentation rather than the   
   >>contents.   
   >>   
   >>"Vincent J. Hrovat"  wrote in message   
   >>news:40l8q1h9m7sbqmlskl7k4c5hbeu1kkh5ht@4ax.com...   
   >>> Ignorantia legis neminem excusat -- Kafkaesque, indeed.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> In a previous post, "oO"  said:   
   >>>   
   >>>>POSTSCRIPT: Seriously, is this true? I'm just gobsmacked. Congress is   
   >>>>passing laws that the American public isn't allowed to know about? Any   
   >>>>of   
   >>>>us   
   >>>>might be prosecuted under one of these laws that we don't know exists?   
   >>>>Courts are being asked to interpret laws they've never seen?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>This gives Kafakesque a very chilling and newly concrete meaning.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)