From: banana@REMOVE_THIS.borve.demon.co.uk   
      
   In article , Trevjon   
    writes   
      
   >"banana"  wrote in message   
   >news:q$3iXLAuS0qDFwh7@borve.demon.co.uk...   
   >> In article <1135294949.722991.205590@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,   
   >> Rachel Spencer  writes   
   >>   
   >>>Trevjon wrote:   
   >>>> "Rachel Spencer"  wrote in message   
   >>>> news:1135291135.998288.170970@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...   
   >>>> > Is your name Cromwell or BB?  If not, don't talk to me.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> As I said, you haven't really got the hang of this usenet thingy, have   
   >>>> you?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Funny how you didn't have a similar reply for your hero Banana isn't it,   
   >>>> for   
   >>>> as far as I can ascertain, his name is neither Cromwell or BB either.   
   >>>   
   >>>Banana and I are friends whether I agree with Banana or not.  Banana is   
   >>>my friend because he does not flame me whether or not he agrees with my   
   >>>opinion/facts or not.   
   >>   
   >> I think any 'objective observer' would agree that, even if it weren't   
   >> for anything else, all of the long-term 'fanatical' accidentalists on   
   >> ACPD (or those whose posts are mainly aimed against 'assassinationists')   
   >> have discredited themselves just by how they treat people!   
      
   >So, from that we can assume that you agree with Rachel's remark that it took   
   >Bernhard 13 days to reply, and even when I explained to her that it doesn't   
   >quite work like that, she still didn't quite grasp the concept, and even   
   >tried to explain the maths involved.  She then rather ironically calls me an   
   >asshole,   
      
   Maybe it was your tone and the obvious fact that you were trying to wind   
   her up?   
      
   BB tried it by saying that "murder" should be put in the plural if more   
   than one person has been murdered, and fell flat on his face. (If I were   
   you, I'd probably comment on your absence of comment on the above, but   
   really, what would be the point?)   
      
   I don't know how often Bernhard reads this newsgroup, and I don't care.   
      
   >which to any casual observer says far more about her than anything.   
   >I'm still not quite sure if the essence of my remarks have actually sunk in   
   >yet.   
   >   
   >Of course, with your superior ability to analyse postings,   
      
   Arsehole! :-)   
      
   >you will have,   
   >quite rightly, come to the same conclusion as me, that at best it displays   
   >incredible "wooly thinking", and at worst, we are dealing with a complete   
   >idiot.   
   >   
   >More astute observers will of course be quite able to come to their own   
   >conclusions about the ability of posters with this type of thinking to have   
   >uncovered a dastardly murder plot,   
      
   Do you think it was an accident then?   
      
   The SIS Director of Operations just went to Paris to see some pictures   
   in the Louvre, right?   
      
   >all by sitting behind a computer screen   
   >thousands of miles away, trawling through worthless "conspiracy" sites, and   
   >presenting them as "fact".   
   >   
   >It just gets funnier and funnier.   
      
   And you the comedy buff too...   
      
   --   
   banana     "The thing I hate about you, Rowntree, is the way you   
               give Coca-Cola to your scum, and your best teddy-bear to   
               Oxfam, and expect us to lick your frigid fingers for the   
               rest of your frigid life." (Mick Travis, 'If...', 1968)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)